Reliability of Reported Maternal Smoking: Comparing the Birth Certificate to Maternal Worksheets and Prenatal and Hospital Medical Records, New York City and Vermont, 2009

Abstract

Maternal smoking is captured on the 2003 US Standard Birth Certificate based on self-reported tobacco use before and during pregnancy collected on post-delivery maternal worksheets. Study objectives were to compare smoking reported on the birth certificate to maternal worksheets and prenatal and hospital medical records. The authors analyzed a sample of New York City (NYC) and Vermont women (n = 1,037) with a live birth from January to August 2009 whose responses to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey were linked with birth certificates and abstracted medical records and maternal worksheets. We calculated smoking prevalence and agreement (kappa) between sources overall and by maternal and hospital characteristics. Smoking before and during pregnancy was 13.7 and 10.4 % using birth certificates, 15.2 and 10.7 % using maternal worksheets, 18.1 and 14.1 % using medical records, and 20.5 and 15.0 % using either maternal worksheets or medical records. Birth certificates had “almost perfect” agreement with maternal worksheets for smoking before and during pregnancy (κ = 0.92 and 0.89) and “substantial” agreement with medical records (κ = 0.70 and 0.74), with variation by education, insurance, and parity. Smoking information on NYC and Vermont birth certificates closely agreed with maternal worksheets but was underestimated compared with medical records, with variation by select maternal characteristics. Opportunities exist to improve birth certificate smoking data, such as reducing the stigma of smoking, and improving the collection, transcription, and source of information.

The effect of e-cigarette indoor vaping restrictions on adult prenatal smoking and birth outcomes

“…The accuracy of cigarette use during pregnancy is significantly improved in the new form relative to the old form. Maternal smoking in the old form agreed with hospital records 84% of the time in one study (Buescher et al, 1993), but this agreement improved to 94% with the new form (Howland et al, 2015). The introduction of the revised birth record resulted in statistically significant increases in smoking in 21 out of 31 states, suggesting that the old form underreported smoking compared to the new (Curtin and Matthews, 2016).…”

Ethnic Enclaves and Pregnancy and Behavior Outcomes Among Asian/Pacific Islanders in the USA

“…Smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy was reported in medical records. As smoking during pregnancy (1.51%) and alcohol use during pregnancy (0.71%) were rare and are typically underreported in medical records [25], we also created a "smoking or alcohol use during pregnancy" variable.…”

Are CNM‐Attended Births in Texas Hospitals Underreported?

“…While no recent studies have been done on the accuracy of provider type on birth certificates, research indicates other data on birth certificates is underreported nationwide, including a number of pregnancy‐related health conditions . Additionally, ACNM's estimate of births per US CNM based on ACNM's Benchmarking Project is 70, providing corroborating evidence that CNM/CM births may be undercounted .…”