2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of Retrospectively Assessed Categorical Menstrual Cycle Length Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond identified methodological differences that limit study comparisons according to extraction from either plasma, serum, urine, and/or saliva (Meyer-Bahlburg, 1977), other factors beyond those assessed in our study could further modulate HPG-axis activities. Lastly, the lack of basal endocrine differences according to menstrual status speak to the challenge of self-reports (Bachand et al, 2009;Jukic et al, 2008;Small et al, 2007) that do not consistently correspond with endocrine concentrations presumed to vary according to diverse reproductive statuses. Future studies will need to take special attention to address this issue with more refined control of reproductive functions among both sexes (Juster et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond identified methodological differences that limit study comparisons according to extraction from either plasma, serum, urine, and/or saliva (Meyer-Bahlburg, 1977), other factors beyond those assessed in our study could further modulate HPG-axis activities. Lastly, the lack of basal endocrine differences according to menstrual status speak to the challenge of self-reports (Bachand et al, 2009;Jukic et al, 2008;Small et al, 2007) that do not consistently correspond with endocrine concentrations presumed to vary according to diverse reproductive statuses. Future studies will need to take special attention to address this issue with more refined control of reproductive functions among both sexes (Juster et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present case too, the longest menstrual cycle was found among both the ends of BMI. The women in the present study were distributed in all the categories of BMI, but dominated in 25-35 days duration of menstrual cycle which has been considered to be the regular menstrual cycle length according to Bachand et al [24]. The impact of excess body weight or body fat mass on menstrual cycle has drawn less attention than low body weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…WHO [23] standards for BMI were used for the study. The information regarding their menstrual cycle was also recorded and in this study cutoff points for menstrual cycle length were those used by Bachand et al [24]. Age at menarche was obtained through recall method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have found moderate agreement between self-reported usual cycle length and prospective daily diary data, with higher agreement among sexually active (2325) and less fecund women (24). We found moderate agreement between prospective FF data and self-reported cycle length at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%