2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters determined by a new instrumented treadmill system

Abstract: BackgroundDespite the emerging use of treadmills integrated with pressure platforms as outcome tools in both clinical and research settings, published evidence regarding the measurement properties of these new systems is limited. This study evaluated the within– and between–day repeatability of spatial, temporal and vertical ground reaction force parameters measured by a treadmill system instrumented with a capacitance–based pressure platform.MethodsThirty three healthy adults (mean age, 21.5 ± 2.8 years; heig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study indicates that the key spatial-temporal gait parameters had excellent ICC values (>0.88) and relatively small SEM and MDC values (<0.055 & <0.153 measurement units, respectively), which were inspected visually by using the 'Bland-Altman' graphs. These test-retest repeatability findings are comparable with other previously reported reliability findings for spatial-temporal gait during both over-ground (Stolze et al 1997;Paterson et al 2008;Meldrum et al 2014) and self-selected speed treadmills (Owings and Grabiner 2004;Faude et al 2012;Reed et al 2013;Liu et al 2016). The MDC values for spatial-temporal gait revealed relatively small amounts of variability made by the GRAIL system, which are sufficient to detect real changes over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study indicates that the key spatial-temporal gait parameters had excellent ICC values (>0.88) and relatively small SEM and MDC values (<0.055 & <0.153 measurement units, respectively), which were inspected visually by using the 'Bland-Altman' graphs. These test-retest repeatability findings are comparable with other previously reported reliability findings for spatial-temporal gait during both over-ground (Stolze et al 1997;Paterson et al 2008;Meldrum et al 2014) and self-selected speed treadmills (Owings and Grabiner 2004;Faude et al 2012;Reed et al 2013;Liu et al 2016). The MDC values for spatial-temporal gait revealed relatively small amounts of variability made by the GRAIL system, which are sufficient to detect real changes over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These treadmills offer potential advantages for advancing gait analysis in both clinical and research settings, by recording multiple consecutive strides in a small space (Belli et al 2001;Goldberg et al 2008;Reed et al 2013). However, walking on a treadmill at fixed speed with the absence of visual flow raises the concern over whether gait is being compensated for by maintaining fixed speed (Sheik-Nainar and Kaber 2007;Terrier and Dériaz 2011;Sloot et al 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effect magnitudes were considered subtle, compared to the random fluctuations expected from repeated measures in this type of experimental design [21,22]. The most prominent differences between SKIN and PIN occurred in kinematic data with up to 25% of ROM (~2-3°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treadmill belt speed was adjustable at intervals of 0.1 km/h between speeds of 0.2 and 22 km/h. Mean within-subject coefficients of variation for repeated measures of spatiotemporal gait parameters during walking in healthy adults are typically <10% [34].…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each patient's "comfortable" walking speed was determined at the outset of the acclimatisation session using a method outlined previously [34]. Following acclimatisation, TSOU in each AT, sagittal ankle motion, GRF, and basic spatiotemporal gait data were sampled synchronously using a common trigger.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%