Reliability of the beighton score and impact of generalized joint mobility and resting scapular position on Median Neurodynamic Test 1

Riley, Sean P.; Grimes, Jason; Calandra, Kylie; Foster, Kelsey; Peet, Melissa; Walsh, Matt

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.07.008

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some studies were conducted prior to authorship of the COSMIN (2010) guidelines, however there is a general lack of referencing to other appropriate standards. Riley et al ., (2020) reference the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, in athlete and dance cohorts. The results and analysis of a study by Riley et al ., (2020) noted prevalence of GJH within a sample has an impact on the kappa values of this tool. As reported by Lijmer et al ., (1999) diagnostic studies with methodological flaws, possibly over-estimate the accuracy of a test and falsely increase the pre-test probability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematised Review of the Beighton Score Compared with Other Commonly Used Measurement Tools for Assessment and Identification of Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH)

Alexander

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review compares the validity and reliability of the Beighton Score to those of other commonly used scores for identifying generalised joint hypermobility (GJH). Inclusion criteria: English language, studies on humans, all types of study designs, publications in academic journals, publications from the year two thousand onwards, publications in print and theses. Exclusion criteria: studies not in English, studies measuring single joints only, studies published before the year 2000, cadaveric studies, papers with only abstracts available. An electronic literature search was undertaken of Pub Med/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, SPORT Discus, Pedro databases, followed by a manual search between August and November 2021. The final review included 73 papers. The PRISMA (2021) COSMIN (2010) guidelines and CASP (2019) criteria were used to evaluate methodological quality and bias. The Beighton Score’s intra-rater and inter-rater reliability ranged between ICC 0.74-0.99 and ICC 0.72-0.98 respectively. The BS has reasonable intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, however validity cannot be accurately determined as incorporation bias was identified as a major issue in study methodology, not previously identified in the literature. Paucity of data prevented accurate assessment of other scoring systems. Urgent research is required to clarify these issues and compare the BS to other tests. No source of funding was received in in undertaking this review. The author has no conflict of interests to disclose. This review was not registered. This review has been conducted as closely as possible in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematised Review of the Beighton Score Compared with Other Commonly Used Measurement Tools for Assessment and Identification of Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH)

Alexander

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To determine structural distinction, if symptoms appear before full elbow extension, then the subject's cervical spine was placed at neutral [9][10][11][12][13]. After that, the individual was requested to bend the cervical spine gently as far as was comfortable.…”

Section: Procedures A) Upper Limb Tension Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finding baseline parameters of the neurodynamic test of the upper and lower limbs: false positive rate among healthy asymptomatic adult

Chitapure,

Walimbe,

Kawathekar

et al. 2024

IJPHY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability of the beighton score and impact of generalized joint mobility and resting scapular position on Median Neurodynamic Test 1

Cited by 2 publications

References 32 publications

A Systematised Review of the Beighton Score Compared with Other Commonly Used Measurement Tools for Assessment and Identification of Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH)

A Systematised Review of the Beighton Score Compared with Other Commonly Used Measurement Tools for Assessment and Identification of Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH)

Finding baseline parameters of the neurodynamic test of the upper and lower limbs: false positive rate among healthy asymptomatic adult

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About