2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the BI-RADS Final Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations in a Telemammography Context

Abstract: The results of this study show very high interdevice agreement, especially for management recommendations derived from malignancy classification, which is one of the most important outcomes in screening programs. This study provides evidence to suggest the interchangeability of the devices evaluated, thereby enabling the provision of low-cost medical imaging services to underserved populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another challenge of health risk level estimation stems from the label quality. For instance, the agreement rate of the radiologists for malignancy is usually less than 80%, resulting in a noisy labeled dataset [38,47]. Despite the often-uncleared distinction between adjacent labels, it is more possible that a well-trained annotator will mislabel a Severe DR (3) sample to Moderate DR (2) rather than No DR (0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge of health risk level estimation stems from the label quality. For instance, the agreement rate of the radiologists for malignancy is usually less than 80%, resulting in a noisy labeled dataset [38,47]. Despite the often-uncleared distinction between adjacent labels, it is more possible that a well-trained annotator will mislabel a Severe DR (3) sample to Moderate DR (2) rather than No DR (0).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The distinction between adjacent labels is often unclear and annotator-dependent, leading to a situation where the same input may be marked with different (although probably adjacent) labels by different practitioners (or even by the same one). Radiologist usually agree on malignancy of less than 80% cases ( [8]), whereas agreement rate may be even lower on predicting individual BIRADS labels ( [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%