2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2000000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the interpretation of coronary angiography by the simple visual method

Abstract: Objective -Evaluation of inter and intraobserver reproducibility of by the visual method interpretation of cineangiogram in a clinically based context. Methods -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, angiography can only be used to evaluate therapeutic effects based on vascular morphology and does not truly represent microcirculatory perfusion of ischemic limb tissues. Angiography also requires a simple subjective visual interpretation, which leads to operator-dependent evaluation of endovascular intervention and significant intra/inter-observer variation [ 4 , 5 ]. Thus, the lack of volumetric characterization and quantitative accuracy of angiography presents challenges in determining success of revascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, angiography can only be used to evaluate therapeutic effects based on vascular morphology and does not truly represent microcirculatory perfusion of ischemic limb tissues. Angiography also requires a simple subjective visual interpretation, which leads to operator-dependent evaluation of endovascular intervention and significant intra/inter-observer variation [ 4 , 5 ]. Thus, the lack of volumetric characterization and quantitative accuracy of angiography presents challenges in determining success of revascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the assessment of the success of revascularisation can be operator dependent and qualitative in nature. Several studies, although not conducted exclusively for lower extremity DSA, have shown that simple visual interpretation of angiography is associated with significant intra- and inter-observer variability 13, 14. Simple visual analysis of DSA images has been a widely adopted and established method of haemodynamic assessment since its advent, but the lack of quantitative and volumetric characterisation limits its accuracy in modern day vascular practise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we performed a search in the literature for evaluation of agreements with CA, although the anatomical reference standard is used, we found a great variation, with Kappa ranging from 36 to 63 for detailed dichotomous measures on the degree of lesion (0.1 -50.51 -69 and >70) and Kappa of 37 to 82 for less detailed dichotomous measures (>70 or >70) 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%