1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02893805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Timeline Follow-Back sexual behavior interview

Abstract: The reliability of self-reported sexual behavior is a question of utmost importance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention research. The Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) interview, which was developed to assess alcohol consumption on the event level, incorporates recall-enhancing techniques that result in reliable information. In this study, the TLFB interview was adapted to assess HIV-related sexual behaviors and their antecedents, and its reliability was assessed. The interview was administered to 110 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total current alcohol consumption was assessed using a timeline follow-back (Allen & Litten, 1992;Sobell & Sobell, 1992) during which an assessor asked participants to reflect back on the past thirty days, mark memorable events on the calendar as anchor points and then recall day by day number of standard drinks consumed. This calendar technique has been used to improve reliability and validity (Weinhardt et al, 1998). For purposes of our model, the Drinker Inventory of Negative Consequences (DrinC) was used to assess negative consequences of drinking for the past 90 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total current alcohol consumption was assessed using a timeline follow-back (Allen & Litten, 1992;Sobell & Sobell, 1992) during which an assessor asked participants to reflect back on the past thirty days, mark memorable events on the calendar as anchor points and then recall day by day number of standard drinks consumed. This calendar technique has been used to improve reliability and validity (Weinhardt et al, 1998). For purposes of our model, the Drinker Inventory of Negative Consequences (DrinC) was used to assess negative consequences of drinking for the past 90 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reliable method has been used extensively in substance use research 82 and specifically with adolescents for recall of both substance use 83 and sexual behavior. 83,84 The timeline followback calendar uses recall-enhancing techniques to provide a detailed assessment of substance use and coitus at the event level.…”
Section: Retrospective Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reliable method has been used extensively in substance use research 82 and specifically with adolescents for recall of both substance use 83 and sexual behavior. 83,84 The timeline followback calendar uses recall-enhancing techniques to provide a detailed assessment of substance use and coitus at the event level.Because it would have been difficult to recall the specifics of affect on any given day, participants were asked to give a general impression of their affect for each of the 14 days, noting in particular days with the best and the worst affective states. The interview took Ļ³30 minutes (more or less, depending on the frequency of substance use and sexual behavior).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants averaged 2.95 (SD = 0.89) sexual partners in the past 3 months and reported using condoms approximately 52% of the time. In terms of partner types (defined by Weinhardt et al, 1998), participants used condoms 61% (38 out of 41 men) of the time with new or casual partners (defined as either first time sexual partners or partners known less than one month and with whom the participant had sex less than five times), and 31% (19 out of 41 men) of the time with regular partners (known longer than one month or with whom the participant had sex five or more times). Additionally, participants drank an average of 77.15 (SD = 43.54) drinks per month, averaging 12.39 (SD = 3.81) drinking days and 5.94 (SD = 1.67) drinks per occasion.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%