Reliability of the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurement using a smartphone goniometer application

Abstract

Background Weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurement (weight-bearing lunge test) is gaining in popularity because it mimics lower extremity function in daily physical activities. The purpose of the study is to assess the intra-rater and the inter-rater reliability of the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurement with a flexed knee using a smartphone application Spirit Level Plus installed on an Android smartphone. Methods Thirty-two young, healthy subjects participated in the study and were measured in four sessions by two examiners. One measurement was taken on each ankle in every session. Eight measurements were taken from each participant. A total of 256 were taken from all the participants. The measurements for the individual subject were repeated no sooner than 24 hours after the first session. In order to assess the reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error measurements (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) at the 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results Statistical data analysis revealed moderate intra-rater reliability for the right ankle (ICC = 0.72, 95% CI [0.49–0.85]) and good intra-rater reliability for the left ankle (ICC = 0.82, 95% CI [0.66–0.91]). Inter-rater reliability is moderate for the right (ICC = 0.73, 95% CI [0.52–0.86]) and the left ankle (ICC = 0.65, 95% CI [0.39–0.81]). Conclusion The observed method is moderately reliable and appropriate when the main objective is to assess ankle dorsiflexion mobility in weight-bearing when weight-bearing is not contraindicated. The concurrent validity of the Spirit Level Plus application is excellent.

The reliability and validity of joint range of motion measurement using zoom and a smartphone application

“…Therefore, this measurement method showed very high levels of intra- and inter-rater reliability. The standard measurement error is 2.2°, which is comparable to or better than other reports of angle measurements using smartphone applications 10 , 11 ) .…”

Effectiveness of the Rehabilitation Training Combined with Maitland Mobilization for the Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…WB-DFROM was conducted to evaluate the ankle dorsiflexion motion angle of subjects. WB-DFROM was used to simulate the function position of ankle dorsiflexion in daily physical activity [ 36 ]. Before the test, the researcher marked the wall and the perpendicular floor with colored tape.…”

A Review on reliability of Android goniometer and Traditional goniometer

“…Report performing any type of risk evaluation prior to utilising a work-related application(5)Many allied health practitioners rely on their ability to assess range of motion of jointAlthough the traditional Goniometer is still the most frequently applied clinical test for measuring joint range of motion, advances in mobile advancements provide doctors with new assessment options.Nevertheless, the accuracy and authenticity of these cellphones and applications remain somewhat in doubt. (7)The Traditional goniometer is a typical methodology for evaluating range of motion (ROM) as part of joint movements. It has various limitations, such as the physician's participation of both hands, which leads to hand instability and inaccuracy.…”