2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of ultrasound for measurement of selected foot structures

Abstract: The ultrasound protocol implemented in this work has been shown to be reliable. It therefore offers the opportunity to quantify the structures concerned and better understand their contributions to foot function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
133
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
133
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported estimates of reliability were good to high. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] With the exception of a study reported by Thoirs and Englsh, 15 the reported intrarater correlation coefficients (ICC) among studies ranged between 0.90 and 0.99. Thoirs and Englsh 15 reported that high test-retest reliability was indicated in the lower extremity when subjects were measured in a standing position (ICC, 0.70-0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.94 for anterior thigh and 0.49-0.84 for posterior thigh, respectively).…”
Section: Validity and Reliability Of Mt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported estimates of reliability were good to high. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] With the exception of a study reported by Thoirs and Englsh, 15 the reported intrarater correlation coefficients (ICC) among studies ranged between 0.90 and 0.99. Thoirs and Englsh 15 reported that high test-retest reliability was indicated in the lower extremity when subjects were measured in a standing position (ICC, 0.70-0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.94 for anterior thigh and 0.49-0.84 for posterior thigh, respectively).…”
Section: Validity and Reliability Of Mt Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Regarding the intrinsic plantar muscles and fascia (PF), the CSA and thickness of the flexor hallucis brevis (FHB), flexor digitorum brevis (FDB), AbH, and fascia can be used to explain the relationship between foot function and clinical conditions (ie, pes planus). [11,12] These RUSI measurements showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from 0.91 to 0.98. [11] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased tissue' stiffness (plantar soft tissues or fascial structure) carries the risk of injury (i.e. ulceration, heel pain or plantar fasciitis) [27][28][29]. US indentation methods were used for evaluating the mechanical properties of the plantar soft tissue (thickness, stiffness), providing useful information regarding mechanical behavior under vertical loading and an indication for the selection of the properties of the orthotic devices materials [30][31][32].…”
Section: Ultrasonography Used To Evaluate the Tissue's Structural Chamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of different ultrasound based measurements was reported in the literature: intra and inter-rater reliability of dynamic compression of the heel pad [38]; dorso-plantar thickness, medio-lateral width and CSA of AbdH [39], thickness and CSA of FHB, FDB, flexor hallucis longus (FHL), quadratus plantae (QP), AbdM, quadratus plantae (PER); thickness of tibialis anterior (TA) and PF [9,28]; fascicle length and pennation angle of MG and TA [40], hypoechoic rims around tendons, joint spaces, erosions, cartilage thickness [10]. However, ultrasonography remains a highly operator-dependent technique [9].…”
Section: Ultrasonography Used To Evaluate the Tissue's Structural Chamentioning
confidence: 99%