1997
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, performance characteristics, construct validity, and an initial clinical application of a Visual Object Learning Test (VOLT).

Abstract: Whereas verbal learning has received considerable attention by cognitive neuropsychology, spatial object learning has been more resistant to study. The paucity of visual learning data has hampered attempts to clarify if visual learning has unique features with specialized neural substrates. In schizophrenia, severe verbal learning impairment has been established, but lack of comparable visual learning measures has thwarted the dissociation of verbal and visual abilities. The Visual Object Learning Test (VOLT) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our results cannot speak to the specificity of face processing impairments or the magnitude of face memory deficits compared with nonface or verbal memory, it is interesting to note that both groups performed better on delayed face memory relative to immediate memory. This finding is consistent with previous work using a recognition paradigm with both face stimuli (35,36) and other spatial stimuli (37). The effect likely occurs because presenting all target stimuli for a second time in the immediate memory condition may enhance recognition during the delayed task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although our results cannot speak to the specificity of face processing impairments or the magnitude of face memory deficits compared with nonface or verbal memory, it is interesting to note that both groups performed better on delayed face memory relative to immediate memory. This finding is consistent with previous work using a recognition paradigm with both face stimuli (35,36) and other spatial stimuli (37). The effect likely occurs because presenting all target stimuli for a second time in the immediate memory condition may enhance recognition during the delayed task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Investigators have pointed out that performances on memory tests such as the AVLT and the VSLT may be importantly influenced by verbalizability of the test stimuli (e.g., Eadie & Shum, 1995;Glahn, Gur, Ragland, Censits, & Gur, 1997). Interestingly, West, Crook, and Barron (1992) found that verbal ability was strongly associated with the scores of healthy adults between 18 and 90 years of age on a series of everyday memory tasks.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of the Effects Of Subject Variables On Avltmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Cognition was assessed at both times with tests of executive function, working memory, visual and verbal learning, using the Abstraction, Inhibition and Working Memory test [32] (AIM), Visual Object Learning Test [33] (VOLT), and Californian Verbal Learning Test [34] (CVLT). From these tests, we obtained the following variables: total score of the first five learning trials from the CVLT, total score of the four learning trials from the VOLT, the abstraction score from the AIM and the abstraction and working memory score from the AIM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%