RAMS '06. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2006.1677402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability prediction for complex medical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a number of researchers have considered the reliability prediction of medical systems at the design and development stage over the last two decades5, 6, less literature deals with the reliability prediction of medical devices while they are in use in hospitals. Ion et al 7 analyze the field data for medical imaging systems during the warranty period. Roelfsema8 presents the results of early reliability prediction for Philips medical systems based on field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of researchers have considered the reliability prediction of medical systems at the design and development stage over the last two decades5, 6, less literature deals with the reliability prediction of medical devices while they are in use in hospitals. Ion et al 7 analyze the field data for medical imaging systems during the warranty period. Roelfsema8 presents the results of early reliability prediction for Philips medical systems based on field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six indices were derived from a questionnaire survey, focusing on the importance of the evaluation factors of events. The fault-risk evaluation index system's assessment matrix was constructed by comparing downtime, spare parts cost, failure recurrence, operational errors, uncontrollable factors, and weight allocation ( Table 1 ) [ [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] ]. The correlation degree analysis method determined the correlation level between different indicators, and MATLAB was used again to ascertain the matrix's consistency level and calculate the weight values ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New technology can be associated with periods of higher service and support demands as installation and manufacturing issues become apparent, unknown design deficiencies appear, and staff build familiarity and develop competencies [ 10 - 12 ]. To yield operational insights into the initial technical reliability of Halcyon, we divided the 30-month evaluation period into two phases: the entry-into-service period of six months and subsequent 24 months of routine clinical use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%