2019
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability, validity and relevance of needs assessment instruments for informal dementia caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, the Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D) [10] is the only scale psychometrically robust [11] recommended for research purposes for planning local services [12]. This is in accordance with the suggestions of Van Haaster et al [9] and, in line with literature [13], involves the perspective of both carers and experts for a more comprehensive assessment of unmet needs of caregivers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the Carers' Needs Assessment for Dementia (CNA-D) [10] is the only scale psychometrically robust [11] recommended for research purposes for planning local services [12]. This is in accordance with the suggestions of Van Haaster et al [9] and, in line with literature [13], involves the perspective of both carers and experts for a more comprehensive assessment of unmet needs of caregivers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The process followed a systematic approach to developing participant-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Its psychometric properties were found to be superior to a number of other caregiver needs assessments in a recent systematic review (Kipfer and Pihet, 2020). PBH-LCI, and MYLOH, its slightly briefer revision renamed after further testing and cultural tailoring with African-American and Latinx caregivers (Sadak et al, 2018), were conceptualized as a way to assess, and ultimately enhance, caregiver "activation" for health care of people with dementia (Sadak et al, 2016).…”
Section: Cross-sector Collaboration In Developing Caregiver Needs Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Several reviews have contributed to our understandings of the needs of care partners [14][15][16] and the needs assessment tools available. 14,17 However, their restricted aims and inclusion criteria have led to a patchwork understanding of these needs. To our knowledge, a broad overview of the literature, including qualitative and quantitative reviews, has not yet been undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%