Reliable Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor Onlay Technique

Degenhardt, Hannes; Pogorzelski, Jonas; Themessl, Alexander; Muench, Lukas N.; Wechselberger, Judith; Woertler, Klaus; Siebenlist, Sebastian; Imhoff, Andreas B.; Scheiderer, Bastian

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.033

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 10 , 11 Although studies have shown that postoperative pain does not vary by location of tenodesis, the most important limitation remains that it may not address more distal pathology; however, if this is suspected, then subpectoral tenodesis techniques may be performed instead ( Table 1 ). 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

Chau,

Limpisvasti

2023

Arthroscopy Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

Chau,

Limpisvasti

2023

Arthroscopy Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…While Woodall et al [13] and Cross et al [12] described the surgical technique of distal biceps tendon repair with all-suture anchors as case reports, no clinical outcome was described by these authors until now. However, all-suture anchors are already being used successfully in other locations such as the shoulder and the hip [33][34][35].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

All-suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair: a preliminary outcome study

Lappen

Geyer

Kadantsev

et al. 2022

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of double intramedullary all-suture anchors’ fixation for distal biceps tendon ruptures. Materials and methods A retrospective case series of patients who underwent primary distal biceps tendon repair with all-suture anchors was conducted. Functional outcome was assessed at a minimum follow-up of at 12 months based on the assessments of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Andrews–Carson Score (ACS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Maximum isometric strength test for flexion and supination as well as postoperative range of motion (ROM) were determined for both arms. Results 23 patients treated with all-suture anchors were assessed at follow-up survey (mean age 56.5 ± 11.4 years, 96% male). The follow-up time was 20 months (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 15–23 months). The following outcome results were obtained: MEPS 100 (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 100–100); ACS 200 (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 195–200); QuickDASH 31 (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 30–31); VAS 0 (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 0–0). The mean strength compared to the uninjured side was 95.6% (range Q0.25–Q0.75, 80.9–104%) for flexion and 91.8 ± 11.6% for supination. There was no significant difference in ROM or strength compared to the uninjured side and no complications were observed in any patient. Conclusion Distal biceps tendon refixation using all-suture anchors provides good-to-excellent results in terms of patient-reported and functional outcome. This repair technique appears to be a viable surgical option, although further long-term results are needed. Level of evidence Level IV (case series)

show abstract

“…9 The study "Reliable Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor Onlay Technique" by Degenhardt, Pogorzelski, Themessl, Muench, Wechselberger, Woertler, Siebenlist, Imhoff, and Scheiderer further evaluated the clinical outcomes and structural integrity using sonography in patients treated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis using an all-suture anchor onlay technique. 10 The authors demonstrated that their technique provided reliable clinical results for pathology of the biceps long head tendon.…”

Section: See Related Article On Page 729mentioning

confidence: 96%

“…In summary, the use of an all-suture anchor in biceps tenodesis has several advantages, and its application has been supported by several studies. With positive clinical outcome measures for biceps tenodesis techniques using all-suture anchors, 10,11 we can expect that using allsuture anchors for biceps tenodesis procedures will be more popular in the future.…”

Section: See Related Article On Page 729mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchor for Shoulder Biceps Tenodesis Results in Excellent Outcomes

Hong

Liu

2022

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliable Clinical and Sonographic Outcomes of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Anchor Onlay Technique

Cited by 9 publications

References 38 publications

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor

All-suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair: a preliminary outcome study

Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchor for Shoulder Biceps Tenodesis Results in Excellent Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About