“…It is now well-known that there are multifold advantages of using microfluidic devices over macroscopic ones owing to their portability, ease of use, availability of a higher surface-to-volume ratio for the process intensified engineering processes, control over the reagent parameters owing to their usage of smaller volumes, and capacity to bring in the aspects of very-large-scale integration (VLSI) for a larger throughput and multitasking, among others. Thus, such microfluidic platforms are found to appear in diverse modern-day functionalities that include drug delivery, − point-of-care diagnostics, − tissue engineering, − high-throughput screening, − protein crystallization, − and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis. , In particular, the success in the integration of multiplexing of microfluidic devices on the lab-on-a-chip , platforms has led to the development of portable laboratory prototypes in the diverse areas of biology, − chemistry, − medicine, , and engineering. , However, several limitations related to microfluidic platforms have emerged over the years, including the diffusion-limited mixing capacity, a relatively lower throughput, and crowding–clogging of transport materials, among others. Of late, such areas have become intense scientific and engineering research.…”