21st International Communications Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit 2003
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-2379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable IP-Multicast Protocol for Bi-directional Satellite Communications Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage of this approach is that the feedback resolution requires multiple round trip times over the high latency satellite channel. In Reference [65], the authors propose forming receiver clusters based on their spatial correlations, e.g. rain fall precipitation data, which is a prime factor that degrades service quality.…”
Section: Avoiding Feedback Implosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of this approach is that the feedback resolution requires multiple round trip times over the high latency satellite channel. In Reference [65], the authors propose forming receiver clusters based on their spatial correlations, e.g. rain fall precipitation data, which is a prime factor that degrades service quality.…”
Section: Avoiding Feedback Implosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm immediately identifies the worst-performing user in the serviced area and designates him as the area representative (AR) based on the fact that the AR transmits FBMs faster than the other users, thus suppressing their feedback. In [23], a cluster-based algorithm is proposed where all Earth terminals belonging to the same cluster use a distinct return channel. The return channel may be reused by other clusters due to the low probability of the event that distant receivers send FBMs simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main disadvantage of this method is that the feedback suppression algorithm assumes deterministic timeouts requiring multiple RTTs over the high delay satellite channel. Furthermore in [7], a cluster-based algorithm is proposed, where Earth terminals within the same cluster use distinct return channels that may be reused by other clusters due to the low probability that distant receivers send FBMs simultaneously. Another feedback suppression algorithm [8] allocates receivers to return channels trying to minimize the total number of return channels used for feedback transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%