2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.2986069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable Rate-of-Change-of-Frequency Measurements: Use Cases and Test Conditions

Abstract: Based on user expectations and requirements, this article discusses three use cases (UCs) for measurements of power system frequency and rate-of-change-of-frequency (ROCOF) measurements, specifying accuracy and latency requirement for each UC. Furthermore, a set of realistic test conditions are proposed, extending those of the present IEC/IEEE 60255-118-1 standard, to ensure ROCOF measuring instruments are adequately tested on their suitability for reliable ROCOF measurements in power systems. Target worst cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, measuring ROCOF, as any derivative magnitude, is prone to error and noise. Intensive filtering is therefore applied, which causes a significant latency period [22]. Estimating the derivative of the frequency requires measures over long time windows, typically 200-500 ms [22][23][24], leading to measurement latencies and response delays around 100-250 ms. During a frequency event, response time is of paramount importance when trying to limit ROCOF and frequency nadir, and therefore a significant difference compared to SG and VSG performance can be expected.…”
Section: Virtual Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, measuring ROCOF, as any derivative magnitude, is prone to error and noise. Intensive filtering is therefore applied, which causes a significant latency period [22]. Estimating the derivative of the frequency requires measures over long time windows, typically 200-500 ms [22][23][24], leading to measurement latencies and response delays around 100-250 ms. During a frequency event, response time is of paramount importance when trying to limit ROCOF and frequency nadir, and therefore a significant difference compared to SG and VSG performance can be expected.…”
Section: Virtual Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of a standard for the requirements on ROCOF maximum latency and error for Fast Frequency Response applications. In [22], an enquiry among utilities yielded that an ideal target would be a latency of 100 ms and a peak error of 0.02 Hz/s for this application. However, taking into account the state-of-the-art in ROCOF measurements, it is challenging to achieve such performance, although it seems possible in most situations.…”
Section: Virtual Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to address such challenges, also the measurement infrastructure needs to undergo a significant renovation, both in terms of instrumentation and control strategies [7]. In particular, the transition from traditional to digital electrical substations paves the way to more sophisticated and optimized approaches for the collection and aggregation of the quantities of interest, e.g., voltage and current levels at the transformer secondary windings [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern power systems are characterized by an everincreasing penetration of distributed generation and renewable energy sources [1], [2]. Due to their inherent volatility and lack of rotating inertia, such resources are likely to produce faster dynamics and high distortion levels, that might interfere with the traditional monitoring and control schemes [3]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%