2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78475-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliance on Scientific Claims in Social and Legal Contexts: An ‘HIV and AIDS’ Case Study

Abstract: translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, "the overreliance on theories that explain why something might be the case has sometimes made it more difficult to validate the empirical claims derived from such theories, with disastrous effects". On controversial medical knowledge, its communication to nonexperts in legal, social, and clinical contexts, and the relationships between overreliance on science and social lack of trust, see also Perin, 2021. We need to design a model of distribution and allocation of responsibility consistent with the necessary human medical intervention, but that also allows for the advantages offered by AI systems in medicine, namely, efficiency and cost reduction. A normative model of responsibility consistent with these premises should then generate the conditions for increasing trust in collaborative teams composed by professionals (i.e., humans) and AI systems (Braun et al, 2020, p. 3).…”
Section: Doctors' Responsibility and The Principle Of Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, "the overreliance on theories that explain why something might be the case has sometimes made it more difficult to validate the empirical claims derived from such theories, with disastrous effects". On controversial medical knowledge, its communication to nonexperts in legal, social, and clinical contexts, and the relationships between overreliance on science and social lack of trust, see also Perin, 2021. We need to design a model of distribution and allocation of responsibility consistent with the necessary human medical intervention, but that also allows for the advantages offered by AI systems in medicine, namely, efficiency and cost reduction. A normative model of responsibility consistent with these premises should then generate the conditions for increasing trust in collaborative teams composed by professionals (i.e., humans) and AI systems (Braun et al, 2020, p. 3).…”
Section: Doctors' Responsibility and The Principle Of Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%