Relics in the Sikh Tradition

Murphy, Anne

doi:10.1002/9781118660072.ch19

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, linguistic anthropologists have studied drawings and paintings (e.g., Chumley 2016, Hoffmann-Dilloway 2020; photographic images in print (e.g., Ball 2014, Sidnell 2021, film (e.g., Hardy 2014;Kirk 2016;Swinehart 2018;Nakassis 2020Nakassis , 2023a, television and video (e.g., Goodwin 1994, Pardo 2013, Urban 2015), and social media (e.g., Swinehart 2012, Calhoun 2019, Ross 2019; blueprints (Murphy 2005); emojis and memes (Soh 2020, Davis 2021); anime and video games (Silvio 2010, Nozawa 2013; and figurines and puppets (Wortham et al 2011, Barker 2019, among others. Linguistic anthropologists have also focused on images within their own practices, in transcription (e.g., Hoffmann-Dilloway 2021, Murphy 2021) and field recordings (e.g., Feld & Williams 1975, Murphy 2023, Zuckerman 2023.…”

Section: Linguistic Anthropology and Imagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Much of this work has focused on language in images, as, for example, in investigations of the representation of speech variation in audiovisual media (Murphy 1978, Lefkowitz 2000, Bucholtz 2011, Bucholtz & Lopez 2011, Queen 2015, Lopez & Bucholtz 2017, Graham 2020 or of the interplay between speech and visual image (e.g., Lefkowitz 2005Lefkowitz , 2019Meek 2006Meek , 2020Jaworski 2015;Davis 2021). Other works, which I focus on herein, have analyzed images as such.…”

Section: Linguistic Anthropology and Imagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Linguistic Anthropology of Images

Nakassis

2023

Annu. Rev. Anthropol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review sketches a linguistic anthropology of images. While linguistic anthropology has not historically focalized images as a central theoretical object of concern, linguistic anthropologists’ research has increasingly concerned images of various sorts. Furthermore, in its critique of structuralist reductions of language, the field has advanced an analytic vocabulary for thinking about the image in discourse. In this article, I review scholarship in linguistic anthropology on prototypic images to show how these advances (e.g., entextualization, performativity, perspective, and enregisterment) can be leveraged to theorize images more generally. In doing so, I argue against any hard distinction between language and image. I conclude by expanding out from a linguistic anthropology of images to what I call “a linguistic anthropology of … ,” a field characterized by an open-ended horizon of objects and modes of inquiry, all linked together as linguistic anthropology. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology, Volume 52 is October 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

show abstract