1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1977.tb00124.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relict magnesian calcite oolite and subsidence of the Amazon shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the position of the oolites dated by 8 with the sea-level change curve (Fig. 3), we agree with the observations by 11 about the lack of reliability of oolite materials as indicators of ancient shores on the Amazon margin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing the position of the oolites dated by 8 with the sea-level change curve (Fig. 3), we agree with the observations by 11 about the lack of reliability of oolite materials as indicators of ancient shores on the Amazon margin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The older dating ages used in 7 were published by 8 and would correspond to the oolites present in the Northern Sector. However 11 , argued that these oolite samples were displaced from their original place of formation and highlighted one should be very careful when using these dated oolite samples to infer reef age and accretion 7 . also stated that the Amazon shelf is mostly covered by muds, a condition which would impede the development of carbonate reefs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such rates, however, reflect only short‐term processes. Long‐term accumulation rates are controlled by subsidence rates, which on the Amazon Shelf have averaged about 15–22 cm/ky since the Miocene [ Kumar et al , 1977]. Over shorter periods of time, different localities on the shelf alternate between multicentury intervals of net accretion and multicentury intervals of net erosion [ Nittrouer et al , 1996].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed survey of the region conducted by the Australian Bureau of Mineral Resources determined the distribution pattern of ooids in the Southern GBR (Marshall, 1977). Since ooids are found throughout this area, but only at depths between 100 to 120 m, we should consider the possibility of secondary transportation of the ooids from shallower sites following their original deposition (eg., Kumar et al, 1977;Kump and Hine, 1986). A source depth shallower than 100 m is not a candidate for the origin of the ooids sands since surface sediments from these depths contain no ooids and the physical oceanography of the area would not have permitted re-deposition (Marshall, 1977).…”
Section: Observed Sea-level From the Ooids And Implication Of Eslmentioning
confidence: 96%