2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relicts of an intra-oceanic arc in the Sapi-Shergol mélange zone (Ladakh, NW Himalaya, India): implications for the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prograde P – T conditions of metamorphism of the Naga Hills eclogites and Sapi‐Shergol blueschists of the Indus‐Tsangpo suture zone in northern Himalayas, both of ocean floor, tholeiitic affinity, and emplaced as tectonic slices within ophiolite in the Burma and Ladakh forearc regions, respectively, may be used to constrain the P – T conditions of the subducting leading edge of the Indian plate prior to the India–Eurasia collision. The peak pressure of eclogite metamorphism at Naga Hills is higher than the peak pressures obtained from the Sapi‐Shergol blueschists (0.9–1.0 GPa at 350–420 °C; Mahéo et al. , 2006) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The prograde P – T conditions of metamorphism of the Naga Hills eclogites and Sapi‐Shergol blueschists of the Indus‐Tsangpo suture zone in northern Himalayas, both of ocean floor, tholeiitic affinity, and emplaced as tectonic slices within ophiolite in the Burma and Ladakh forearc regions, respectively, may be used to constrain the P – T conditions of the subducting leading edge of the Indian plate prior to the India–Eurasia collision. The peak pressure of eclogite metamorphism at Naga Hills is higher than the peak pressures obtained from the Sapi‐Shergol blueschists (0.9–1.0 GPa at 350–420 °C; Mahéo et al. , 2006) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The Karakoram and Lhasa Terranes are considered to have existed previously as a single tectonic unit, now separated by the Karakoram Fault [e.g., Searle et al , 1988]. To the south of the Karakoram‐Lhasa block lies the Kohistan Ladakh Island Arc (KLIA), considered to have collided with the southern margin of Eurasia during mid to late Cretaceous times [e.g., Clift et al , 2000; Maheo et al , 2006; Robertson and Degnan , 1994; Rolland et al , 2000, 2002b; Schärer et al , 1984b; Searle et al , 1988; Sutre , 1990; Treloar et al , 1996], creating the Shyok Suture Zone (SSZ) [ Robertson and Collins , 2002].…”
Section: Geology Of the Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much uncertainty still exists with regards to the order and nature of tectonic events which governed the early phases of India‐Eurasia collision. One of these issues concerns the collisional history of Kohistan‐Ladakh Island Arc with most authors suggesting that it collided with Eurasia before India in the mid‐late Cretaceous [e.g., Clift et al , 2000; Gaetani et al , 1993; Maheo et al , 2006; Robertson and Collins , 2002; Rolland et al , 2000; Searle et al , 1988; Treloar , 1997; Treloar et al , 2003], and others suggesting an India‐arc collision at 61 Ma, predating India‐Eurasia collision at 50 Ma [e.g., Andrews‐Speed and Brookfield , 1982; Khan et al , 2009]. Although that problem is beyond the scope of this paper, detrital zircon data from the Jurutze Formation (see section 8) suggests Lhasa Block contributing sediment within the ITSZ by 53.4 (±1.4) Ma, favoring docking of the Kohistan‐Ladakh Island Arc and Eurasia earlier than a 50 Ma India‐Eurasia collision.…”
Section: Summary: Paleogeographic Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of these high‐ P lithologies may be a challenge in cases where they are affected by strong retrogression during exhumation. Descriptions of serpentinite mélanges are common in Mesozoic and Cenozoic orogens, especially those located in the circum‐Pacific and Caribbean regions (García‐Casco et al ., , , ; Kato & Saka, ; Mahéo et al ., ; Guilmette et al ., ; Hirauchi et al ., ; Lázaro et al ., ; Blanco‐Quintero et al ., ,b; Escuder‐Viruete et al ., ; Escuder‐Viruete & Baumgartner, ). These units are more unusual in Palaeozoic orogens, with recent reports from the Caledonian orogen of southern Scotland (Kawai et al ., ), and are almost absent in Precambrian orogens, although some significant reports, as in the Anti‐Atlas mountains of Morocco, have been provided (Hefferan et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%