2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relief and drainage evolution during the exhumation of the Sierra Nevada (SE Spain): Is denudation keeping pace with uplift?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of fluvial erosion indicates roughly whether there has been equilibrium between uplift and erosion of landscapes over the last million years (e.g., Whipple, ). The presence of minimally dissected summit surfaces in the Sierra de Gador argues for a transient state of the range's topography, whereas equilibrium seems to have been reached for the Sierra Nevada (Azañón et al., ). This difference could be explained either by a later uplift stage of the Sierra de Gador and/or by the resetting of the topography due to the Tortonian marine transgression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of fluvial erosion indicates roughly whether there has been equilibrium between uplift and erosion of landscapes over the last million years (e.g., Whipple, ). The presence of minimally dissected summit surfaces in the Sierra de Gador argues for a transient state of the range's topography, whereas equilibrium seems to have been reached for the Sierra Nevada (Azañón et al., ). This difference could be explained either by a later uplift stage of the Sierra de Gador and/or by the resetting of the topography due to the Tortonian marine transgression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) and continuing to the north and east. The χ value disparity across the ridge of Sierra Nevada is mimicked by hypsometric analysis of stream long profiles draining the range to the north vs. those draining to the south (Azañón et al ., , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work concludes that the main thrusting within the external zones of the central Betics occurred during lower Miocene (Aquitanian‐Burdigalian; circa 20 Ma) [ Crespo‐Blanc , , ] and that the FTB front was subsequently dismantled generating the OU during Langhian times (circa 16–14 Ma) [ Azañón et al ., ; Roldán et al ., , ; Rodríguez‐Fernández et al ., ] (Figures a and b). However, post‐Langhian extensional and contractional structures have been widely observed both in the western Gibraltar Arc [ Balanyá et al ., ; Barcos et al ., ; Jiménez‐Bonilla et al ., , ] and in the eastern Betics [e.g., Giaconia et al ., ; Pérez‐Peña et al ., ; Azañón et al ., ]. Our observations from the IFTB‐MFTB agree with these previous results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%