Ancient Paquimé and the Casas Grandes World
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt183p9cj.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion and Cosmology in the Casas Grandes World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, nearly 30 years later, the volume edited by Minnis and Whalen (2015) again explicitly revisits Di Peso's ideas, and also ideas that have structured research since the 1988 seminar, based on new theoretical frameworks and also on vast quantities of new excavation and survey that have occurred since 1988. These new data and critical interpretations inform recent understandings of the earliest archaeological remains in Casas Grandes (Kelley and Searcy 2015), agricultural and also craft production (Minnis and Whalen 2015;Rakita and Cruz 2015), political and religious organization (Douglas and MacWilliams 2015;Van Pool and Van Pool 2015), and also regional settlement patterns and the relationships between the core region and its wider surroundings (Whalen and Pitezel 2015;Punzo and Villalpando 2015). A chapter by David Phillips and Eduardo Gamboa (2015) reviews evidence of the end of Casas Grandes as a defined cultural tradition.…”
Section: Revisiting Old Ideasmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Now, nearly 30 years later, the volume edited by Minnis and Whalen (2015) again explicitly revisits Di Peso's ideas, and also ideas that have structured research since the 1988 seminar, based on new theoretical frameworks and also on vast quantities of new excavation and survey that have occurred since 1988. These new data and critical interpretations inform recent understandings of the earliest archaeological remains in Casas Grandes (Kelley and Searcy 2015), agricultural and also craft production (Minnis and Whalen 2015;Rakita and Cruz 2015), political and religious organization (Douglas and MacWilliams 2015;Van Pool and Van Pool 2015), and also regional settlement patterns and the relationships between the core region and its wider surroundings (Whalen and Pitezel 2015;Punzo and Villalpando 2015). A chapter by David Phillips and Eduardo Gamboa (2015) reviews evidence of the end of Casas Grandes as a defined cultural tradition.…”
Section: Revisiting Old Ideasmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sprehn (2003) and VanPool and colleagues (2008) note that Babicora and Ramos Polychromes share similar ceramic technology and iconography but are differentiated by the skill evident in their decoration, with Babicora typically appearing to be a “poorly executed” copy of Ramos designs (although some Babicora vessels are beautifully decorated and occasional Ramos vessels are poorly decorated). Additionally, Carpenter (2002) indicates that the two are primarily associated with different areas, with Ramos Polychrome most prominent in and around Paquime at the height of the Medio period, while Babicora Polychrome was initially made earlier and to the south.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casas Grandes ceramic types are split between the Viejo and Medio periods, with some overlap between the two. Types are primarily differentiated by finishing techniques and painted elements (Brand 1935; Di Peso et al 1974; Sayles 1936; VanPool et al 2008:60). Di Peso (1974) defined a number of Viejo period types including Anchondo Red-on-brown, Leal Red-on-brown, Pilon Red-on-brown, Fernando Red-on-brown, and Mata Red-on-brown textured, but Kelley and Searcy (2015) note that these types are likely not valid across the entire region and may not be valid anywhere.…”
Section: Casas Grandes Potterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the horned serpent was of singular importance at Paquime´ (Di Peso, 1974: 548;VanPool and VanPool, 2015). Throughout Mesoamerica, plumed/horned serpents are associated with leadership and authority (Evans, 2004: 353;Ringle et al, 1998), making it a natural symbol for the emerging Paquime´elites to use as they adopted West Mexican ritual systems.…”
Section: People and Deitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%