Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion and State: Complexity in Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The community involves "the creative energy of interacting people" with "shared bonds that hold a group together," whereas institution is the objective structure that "controls and channels this energy" (Haight 2008, 47). A distinct development of the Nordic Churches has been their association with the nation-state and its institutions as part of the Nordic welfare model where social security has been externalized to state institutions (Kühle et al 2017;Nivala 2008, 159). In this context the ELCF could also afford to build an institution run by highly educated professionals.…”
Section: Institution or Community?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The community involves "the creative energy of interacting people" with "shared bonds that hold a group together," whereas institution is the objective structure that "controls and channels this energy" (Haight 2008, 47). A distinct development of the Nordic Churches has been their association with the nation-state and its institutions as part of the Nordic welfare model where social security has been externalized to state institutions (Kühle et al 2017;Nivala 2008, 159). In this context the ELCF could also afford to build an institution run by highly educated professionals.…”
Section: Institution or Community?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modernization has challenged Christian worldviews in many ways, among which the emphasis on individual freedom of choice has conflicted with the role of mass institutions, such as national majority Churches, as sources of meaning and belonging (Kühle et al 2017;Woodhead 2016, 197;Inglehart 2018, 64). Membership in the Evangelical-Lutheran Church of Finland (later the ELCF) remained a strong part of the national identity until recently, but during the last few decades this union has faced a serious weakening, in particular among young adults, the "generation Y" (Niemelä 2015;Mikkola, Niemelä and Petterson 2007;Furseth et al 2017, 45-49).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in 2019, all Nordic Lutheran churches still enjoy constitutional preference, though the state's legislative authority over the church has been restricted and the state executive authority over the church has either been annulled or restricted. Among its Nordic neighbours, the ELCF is the most independent from the state (Kühle et al 2018).…”
Section: The Same-sex Legislation and The Response In The Churchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do get personal and company tax reductions if they have been granted so-called (Kühle et al, 2017). In contrast, the legal procedures in Sweden and Denmark are centralised, albeit with the significant difference that recognised faith communities in Sweden are afforded financial and administrative support by the state.…”
Section: Legal and Financial Governance Of The Multi-religious Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 As illustrated above, Norway not only facilitates the most extensive financial state support for religious groups and organisations in Scandinavia, but the state also enables the most equal religious system because the majority church and various minority religions are supported in equal measure. As such, Norway stands out as the Scandinavian exception in being the most liberal country on minority religions when recognising faith communities that do not afford any fixed definition of 'faith community', minimum membership requirements or formal advisory committees, leaving local county governors to handle applications for state recognition of religions (Kühle et al, 2017). In contrast, the legal procedures in Sweden and Denmark are centralised, albeit with the significant difference that recognised faith communities in Sweden are afforded financial and administrative support by the state.…”
Section: Legal and Financial Governance Of The Multi-religious Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%