2002
DOI: 10.1080/00750770209555795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion as an indicator of ethnicity in Northern Ireland‐an alternative perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed Doherty and Poole (2002) argue for alternatives to the ethnic groups of Catholic and Protestant in order to reflect the fluidity of ethnicity observed in the 1991 Census Sample of Anonymised Records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed Doherty and Poole (2002) argue for alternatives to the ethnic groups of Catholic and Protestant in order to reflect the fluidity of ethnicity observed in the 1991 Census Sample of Anonymised Records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These differing stances over the territorial arrangements largely overlapped with the ethno‐religious cleavage within society (O'Leary, 2019; O'Malley & Walsh, 2013). In turn, this cleavage was reinforced by the conflict, which increased polarization and solidified residential segregation (Doherty & Poole, 2002; Guelke, 2000).…”
Section: Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even leaving aside those who failed to return census forms, the religion non-response rate was 9.4% in 1971 and 18.5% in 1981, compared with only 1.9% in 1961. In the absence of any nationalist boycott campaign in 1991, non-response fell, but it remained significant at 7.3% (with an additional 3.8% specifying that they had no religion) (Doherty and Poole, 2002: 77). The question added in 2001 was designed to address this.…”
Section: The Changing Content Of the Census: New Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%