2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion, clubs, and emergent social divides

Abstract: JEL classification: C63 Z12 D71 D72Keywords: Culture divide Religious divide Club theory Agent-based model Sacrifice and stigma a b s t r a c t Arguments regarding the existence of an American cultural divide are frequently placed in a religious context. This paper seeks to establish that, all politics aside, the American religious divide is real, that religious polarization is not a uniquely American phenomenon, and that religious divides can be understood as naturally emergent within the club theory of relig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a social scientific lens, it may be posited that religion also may (a) create moral certainty in believers that leads to conflict with nonbelievers (Woodruff, Van Tongeren, McElroy, Davis, & Hook, 2014); (b) divide people between believers and nonbelievers, saved and damned, "us" and "them" (Lichterman, 2008;Makowsky, 2011); (c) lead people to experience guilt, repression, and hypocrisy (Inozu, Karanci, & Clark, 2012); (d) promote passive fatalism (Franklin, Schlundt, & Wallston, 2008); (e) create gender inequities in marriage, family, and society (Schnabel, 2016;Sigalow & Fox, 2014); (f) encourage irrational and/or "magical" thinking (Routledge, Abeyta, & Roylance, 2016); (g) enable sexual, emotional, physical, and/or financial victimization and abuse of children, elderly, and other vulnerable persons (Simonic, Mandelj, & Novsak, 2013;Stotland, 2000); and (h) be subject to being employed as a destructive force or weapon (i.e., the Inquisition, pogroms, the Crusades, jihad, the Holocaust, terrorism).…”
Section: Religion May Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a social scientific lens, it may be posited that religion also may (a) create moral certainty in believers that leads to conflict with nonbelievers (Woodruff, Van Tongeren, McElroy, Davis, & Hook, 2014); (b) divide people between believers and nonbelievers, saved and damned, "us" and "them" (Lichterman, 2008;Makowsky, 2011); (c) lead people to experience guilt, repression, and hypocrisy (Inozu, Karanci, & Clark, 2012); (d) promote passive fatalism (Franklin, Schlundt, & Wallston, 2008); (e) create gender inequities in marriage, family, and society (Schnabel, 2016;Sigalow & Fox, 2014); (f) encourage irrational and/or "magical" thinking (Routledge, Abeyta, & Roylance, 2016); (g) enable sexual, emotional, physical, and/or financial victimization and abuse of children, elderly, and other vulnerable persons (Simonic, Mandelj, & Novsak, 2013;Stotland, 2000); and (h) be subject to being employed as a destructive force or weapon (i.e., the Inquisition, pogroms, the Crusades, jihad, the Holocaust, terrorism).…”
Section: Religion May Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural question is indeed whether certain narratives may have a different impact based on the underlying cultural orientation. To capture these contextual features, we focus on the division between Republican-and Democratic-leaning states that is at the root of the so-called "American cultural divide" 31 .…”
Section: Additional Results: Narratives and The Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, political parties and politicians have shown an increasing tendency to divide the electorate on cultural and religious issues rather than on economic differences. In this respect, some studies illustrate how cultural divisions are necessary to mobilize inframarginal voters and increase politicians' chances of victory 31,35,36 . In these models, social cleavages allow politicians to send targeted messages.…”
Section: Additional Results: Narratives and The Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%