2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental support: The opposing pathways of stewardship belief and belief in a controlling god

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, belief in “suprahuman powers” is often associated with relinquishing personal agency and subsequent inertia (Gifford 2011 ). Indeed, a recent study of Christians in the U.S. revealed opposing influences of stewardship beliefs and belief in a controlling god with respect to pro-environmental support (Eom et al 2021 ). Understanding which theological messages, including those concerned with identifying as part of a wider faith network, are most effectively activated for environmental outcomes would help both religious actors and policy-makers enhance positive engagement with faith communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, belief in “suprahuman powers” is often associated with relinquishing personal agency and subsequent inertia (Gifford 2011 ). Indeed, a recent study of Christians in the U.S. revealed opposing influences of stewardship beliefs and belief in a controlling god with respect to pro-environmental support (Eom et al 2021 ). Understanding which theological messages, including those concerned with identifying as part of a wider faith network, are most effectively activated for environmental outcomes would help both religious actors and policy-makers enhance positive engagement with faith communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that consumers' feelings of guilt indicate that they have not achieved behavioral goals (e.g., environmentally friendly behaviors), which can drive motivation and change in attitudes toward environmentally friendly behaviors (Adams et al, 2020). It has also been shown in recent research that guilt plays a vital role in the change of attitudes toward environmental protection and the promotion of environmental behavior (Adams et al, 2020;Eom et al, 2021;Shipley and van Riper, 2021;Haj-Salem et al, 2022).…”
Section: Nostalgia Guilt and Awe Of Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that show that being religious has a negative impact on the tolerance of environmental harms with, for example, Dietz et al (1998) arguing that education, especially religious teachings that emphasize environmental sanctity, can increase environmental concern and reduce environmental harms. Findings of such studies show that being religious increases sustainable wildlife consumption and pro-environmental behaviors (Eom et al 2021;Johnson et al 2017).…”
Section: Religiosity Neutralization and Tolerance Of Environmental Harmsmentioning
confidence: 99%