1984
DOI: 10.1093/sf/63.2.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion, Mastery-Over-Nature, and Environmental Concern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
130
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, empirical research shows some contradictory results [53,54], due to the complex interactions between religious beliefs, political orientation and environmental concern, as explained by Sherkat and Ellison [11]. These authors argue that Protestants are more willing to accept a personal pro-environment behaviour but, being influenced by conservative stances on the seriousness of risks, they give little support to environmental activism.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Application To Transport Sector mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, empirical research shows some contradictory results [53,54], due to the complex interactions between religious beliefs, political orientation and environmental concern, as explained by Sherkat and Ellison [11]. These authors argue that Protestants are more willing to accept a personal pro-environment behaviour but, being influenced by conservative stances on the seriousness of risks, they give little support to environmental activism.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Application To Transport Sector mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because humans are part of nature, and as the only rational beings we should look after it; (2) Because nature was created by God; (3) Because life and all its manifestations (humans, animals, plants, landscapes, etc.) have intrinsic value; (4) Because nature serves human needs; (5) Because if nature is damaged, human beings will be too.…”
Section: Motivation For Nature Conservation and Religious Affiliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Nuclear fission should be absolutely prohibited; (2) Nuclear fission should be accepted only as a temporary solution until renewable sources are viable; (3) Genetically Modified (GM) crops would be admissible if they improved food security in poor countries; (4) An additional tax should be introduced to encourage the use of renewable energy; (5) The use of private cars should be restricted to reduce emissions; (6) The use of pesticides should be banned even if this implies a reduction in food production.…”
Section: Environmental Values and Religious Affiliationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations