2016
DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion, Poverty, and Development

Abstract: This article serves two purposes. First, it introduces the forum that follows in this issue on religion and development. Second, it serves as a review of the small but quickly growing literature on how religion interacts with efforts by (often religious) people and organizations to ameliorate poverty worldwide. We address the need to define both “religion” and “development” with clarity and precision. We also call for further research in this area by sociologists, particularly at a time when the landscape of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual experiences come across as more nuanced, reflected and perhaps more wise than what is portrayed in much of the research literature. I therefore agree with Offutt et al’s (2016: 2) statement that, ‘arguments about whether religion is inherently good or bad for particular development outcomes such as economic growth are ultimately futile’ and that many studies lead to contradictory claims. I would add to their conclusion that the contradictory claims are perhaps not only due to research design, but exist because there are inherent paradoxes and tensions in the Christian faith and its application to development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The individual experiences come across as more nuanced, reflected and perhaps more wise than what is portrayed in much of the research literature. I therefore agree with Offutt et al’s (2016: 2) statement that, ‘arguments about whether religion is inherently good or bad for particular development outcomes such as economic growth are ultimately futile’ and that many studies lead to contradictory claims. I would add to their conclusion that the contradictory claims are perhaps not only due to research design, but exist because there are inherent paradoxes and tensions in the Christian faith and its application to development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As much as religion might be useful for society, Offutt et al's (2016) argued that faith and the doctrine of Christian churches could limit innovation use by the leaders to better the lives of members. Religious leaders play a vital position in terms of social welfare provisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most church leaders approach to managing change for effective organizational performance is limited with innovation abilities due to faith, spirituality and doctrines (Joakim & White, 2015;Hong, 2012). Without deploying effective innovation, other competencies failed to manage uncertainties or deliver effective organizational performance that benefits followers (Offutt et al, 2016;Probasco, 2016). Globally, nonprofit church leaders face radical changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some findings lead to the conclusion that most religions with the exception of Romano-Catholicism had negative influences on economic growth while other had found that some religions like Islam and Confucianism had more positive influence than Romano-Catholicism. Some studies identified a negative influence of religion in Islam-dominated countries, other a positive one (Offutt, Probasco & Vaidyanathan, 2016: 3).…”
Section: World Research On Religion and Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%