“…Even though all participants argued that they were partially constrained by nonscientist buyer expectations of the scientist as a quasi-magical being, it seemed that they maintained agency in their identity work, duplicitously drawing on scientism to position themselves akin to scientist priests (Harris, 2017;Jackelén, 2008) capable of using technological sorcery (Haynes, 1994;Schummer, 2006). While clearly a breach of the supposedly secular-materialist foundations of the natural sciences (Plantinga, 2012), scientism is a vehicle for cultural Christians (Moffat & Yoo, 2019) to develop a semiscientific religion not for society (Lessl, 1996), but for high-technology sales. Within this false theocracy, pseudoscientist sellers are avid metaphysical bricoleurs, combining religious and pseudoscientific themes, to position themselves as the ultimate arbiters of truth (Bassett, 2012;Delaney & Hastie, 2007), supposedly mandated (Kant, 1793(Kant, /1960) by the metaphorical 'God' Science.…”