Religionen Verstehen 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92777-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religion und Politik – Max Weber und Émile Durkheim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parsons did not question Weber’s analysis of the differentiation of secular value spheres within modern society – quite to the contrary. But he did not have much affinity with the fin-de-siècle pessimism that permeated Weber’s analyses of Western society and its religious culture (Tyrell, 2011). Parsons argued that the increasing differentiation of specialized subsystems did not have to signify the loss of religious concerns in favor of worldly interests.…”
Section: Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parsons did not question Weber’s analysis of the differentiation of secular value spheres within modern society – quite to the contrary. But he did not have much affinity with the fin-de-siècle pessimism that permeated Weber’s analyses of Western society and its religious culture (Tyrell, 2011). Parsons argued that the increasing differentiation of specialized subsystems did not have to signify the loss of religious concerns in favor of worldly interests.…”
Section: Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%