2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religiosity and Energy Poverty: Empirical evidence across countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all models, a 1% increase in technolog development will reduce EP by 0.855, 0.950, and 0.953%, respectively. The findings are justified from the study of Ampofo and Mabefam (2021) ; Kay et al (2021) , Riva et al (2021) , and Barrella et al (2022) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In all models, a 1% increase in technolog development will reduce EP by 0.855, 0.950, and 0.953%, respectively. The findings are justified from the study of Ampofo and Mabefam (2021) ; Kay et al (2021) , Riva et al (2021) , and Barrella et al (2022) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, Opoku et al (2021) show that women's representa tion in parliaments improves electricity access, energy efficiency and renewable energy consumption. The microeconomic studies emphasize the importance of cultural factors, namely ethnic diversity (Koomson et al, 2022), race (Dogan et al, 2022), religiosity (Ampofo & Mabefam, 2021;Churchill & Smyth, 2022) and culture. From an institutional perspective, Ahlborg et al (2015) point out that institutional quality, including democracy, improves access to electricity.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Determinants Of Access To Electricitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social factors, such as education, have been identified as improving access to electricity in developing countries (Apergis et al., 2022). A microeconomic literature highlights the importance of cultural factors, namely Protestantism (Churchill & Smyth, 2022), ethnic diversity (Koomson et al., 2022), race (Dogan et al., 2022), religiosity (Ampofo & Mabefam, 2021) and culture (Chaudhry & Shafiullah, 2021). Studies highlighting macroeconomic factors appear to be more numerous and emphasize the role of financial inclusion (Koomson & Danquah, 2021), financial development (Mohsin et al., 2022), foreign aid (Munyanyi & Churchill, 2022), government spending (Nguyen & Su, 2022), per capita income (Zhang et al., 2019), income inequality (Nguyen & Nasir, 2021) and most recently, foreign capital flows (Djeunankan et al., 2023; Nguea et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the Lewbel (2012) method is that it can be employed in cases when a conventional instrument is not available or weak (Mishra & Smyth, 2015). It has been widely employed as an identification strategy in the literature on energy poverty (see, e.g., Ampofo & Mabefam, 2021;Awaworyi Churchill et al, 2020b;Farrell & Fry, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). The Lewbel (2012) approach does not require one to satisfy the exclusion restriction.…”
Section: Internal Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%