2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religiosity and natives’ social contact with new refugees. Explaining differences between East and West Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, researchers have shown that the receiving country's norms and values are also important for immigrant integration. For example, Steinmann (2020) has demonstrated that natives' religiosity is a facilitating factor for establishing contacts with refugees in Germany. Likewise, in her qualitative study of Vietnamese marriage immigrants in Taiwan and South Korea, Chang (2019) showed that the way the origin and receiving country's gender roles interact either hindered or facilitated immigrants' cultural integration.…”
Section: The Receiving Country's Religiosity and Gender Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, researchers have shown that the receiving country's norms and values are also important for immigrant integration. For example, Steinmann (2020) has demonstrated that natives' religiosity is a facilitating factor for establishing contacts with refugees in Germany. Likewise, in her qualitative study of Vietnamese marriage immigrants in Taiwan and South Korea, Chang (2019) showed that the way the origin and receiving country's gender roles interact either hindered or facilitated immigrants' cultural integration.…”
Section: The Receiving Country's Religiosity and Gender Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, as in many other Western European countries, a steadily growing migrant population from highly religious origin countries encounters an increasingly nonreligious native majority (Norris and Inglehart 2012; Voas 2008; Voas and Fleischmann 2012). Due to the differences in religiosity between immigrants and natives, there has been an increase in scholarly interest in the relation between religion and various integration outcomes, such as educational achievement (Carol and Schulz 2018), labor market behavior (Kanas and Müller 2021; Khoudja and Fleischmann 2015), social contacts (Maliepaard and Schacht 2018; Steinmann 2020), and cultural attitudes (Röder 2014). But in contrast to the United States, where religion is traditionally viewed as a stepping stone into mainstream society, Europeans often perceive religion as a barrier to immigrants’ integration (Foner and Alba 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding stands in contrast to assumptions often propagated by the populist right (Korteweg and Yurdakul 2014). Second, by distinguishing between minority-majority, intra-minority, and inter-minority contact, we extend previous research, which has only focused on refugees' social contact with the longer-residing population (Huizinga and van Hoven 2018;Steinmann 2020). This extension is important because different types of social contact have distinct effects on immigrants' labor market outcomes (Lancee 2010;Kanas et al 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, this article evaluates the importance of these gender-role values for explaining refugee women's social contact compared to alternative explanatory factors. Second, it adds to recent studies on refugee integration (e.g., Gericke et al 2018;Adam et al 2019;Brücker, Kosyakova, and Vallizadeh 2020;Kogan and Kalter 2020) by distinguishing between refugee women's minority-majority, intra-minority, and inter-minority contact (for studies on refugees' social contact with the longer-residing population in general, see Huizinga and van Hoven 2018;Steinmann 2020). Ample empirical evidence from the Dutch and German context shows that each type of social contact has distinct effects on another dimension of integration -immigrants' labor market integration, with social contact with the majority population being the most beneficial for immigrants' labor market outcomes (Lancee 2010;Kanas et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%