2021
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Affiliation and Conceptions of the Moral Domain

Abstract: What is the relationship between religious affiliation and conceptions of the moral domain? Putting aside the question of whether people from different religions agree about how to answer moral questions, here we investigate a more fundamental question: How much disagreement is there across religions about which issues count as moral in the first place? That is, do people from different religions conceptualize the scope of morality differently? Using a new methodology to map out how individuals conceive of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it seems to match to some extent patterns of normative judgments made by Western participants (Haidt et al, 1993;Levine et al, 2021; see Sections 2.3 and 2.4), the boundary between the two categories is much blurrier and intermediate cases much more common than SDT would predict. These results led some authors to propose that the moral/conventional distinction is culture-specific and not a human universal (e.g., Machery, 2018;Stich, 2018b, p. 554;Shweder et al, 1987, pp.…”
Section: The Moral/conventional Distinctionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While it seems to match to some extent patterns of normative judgments made by Western participants (Haidt et al, 1993;Levine et al, 2021; see Sections 2.3 and 2.4), the boundary between the two categories is much blurrier and intermediate cases much more common than SDT would predict. These results led some authors to propose that the moral/conventional distinction is culture-specific and not a human universal (e.g., Machery, 2018;Stich, 2018b, p. 554;Shweder et al, 1987, pp.…”
Section: The Moral/conventional Distinctionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Given how much some religions moralize their religious norms (Levine et al, 2021), participants rated how much their religious or spiritual beliefs influenced their "life decisions" and "moral beliefs" on a scale from "A great deal" (2) to "Not at all" (0), with 41 participants (16%) selecting "I don't have religious or spiritual beliefs".…”
Section: Religion's Influence On Life and Moralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do not mean to draw a sharp distinction between moral decisions and other kinds of social normative decisions. 4 In many social contexts, decisions often have intersecting and conflicting normative elements, though not all of them recognizably "moral" on traditional definitions (Levine et al 2020b). For instance, in an organizational context, an employee may need to balance loyalty to colleagues, following correct procedure, keeping a promise, avoiding deception, not missing good opportunities for the organization, doing what everyone else would do, doing what they are told by the manager, reporting wrong-doing, and so on.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there may be no coherent "intuitive" or universally accepted definition of what counts as moral at all(Levine et al 2020b, Stich 2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%