2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-013-9290-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Review and Examination of Current and Future Trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghumman (2013) explains that hiring prejudices may exist towards religious groups because certain religious beliefs of applicants could pose challenges to the smooth functioning of the organisation. This is especially apparent in observable religious beliefs such as wearing a religious head-dress (Ball and Haque, 2003).…”
Section: Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ghumman (2013) explains that hiring prejudices may exist towards religious groups because certain religious beliefs of applicants could pose challenges to the smooth functioning of the organisation. This is especially apparent in observable religious beliefs such as wearing a religious head-dress (Ball and Haque, 2003).…”
Section: Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, therapists in the mental health field seem to prefer patients who share their religious beliefs; however, whether or not this effect extends to the employer-employee relationship is uncertain. More recently, Ghumman et al (2013) explained that organisations affiliated to particular religions may hire employees that display and share similar religious beliefs. Meta-reviews on the similarity effect describe religion as a significant moderator of liking when religion is common between two people (Ben-Ner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Ghumman and colleagues (Ghumman et al 2013) and Martinez and colleagues (Martinez et al 2013) point to groups that are targeted by discrimination, but about which research and case law is insufficient. The former paper reviews research on religious discrimination and concludes that the increasing religious diversity of American workers, increasing expression of religious beliefs, and unique attributes of religious identities, taken with ambiguity in legal standards, compels focused attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a, nationally representative survey (Avery et al 2008) indicated that more than 4 % of employees believe they have been discriminated against on the basis of sex within the past year alone and more than 3 % feel that their race or ethnicity was held against them during that same period. Regarding religion, King and Ahmad (2010) recently reported that Muslim job applicants, a particularly controversial religious group in the U.S. since September 11, 2001, received more negative reactions than those who were not visibly Muslim (see Ghumman et al 2013 for a more comprehensive discussion of the literature on religious discrimination). A recent investigation by Harrison and Thomas (2009) showed colorism to be alive and well in that skin color influenced the level of bias exhibited against Black applicants to the disadvantage of those with darker skin.…”
Section: Discrimination Is Still Prevalent On Protected Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%