2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Fragmentation, Social Identity and Conflict: Evidence from an Artefactual Field Experiment in India

Abstract: We examine the impact of religious identity and village-level religious fragmentation on behavior in Tullock contests. We report on a series of two-player Tullock contest experiments conducted on a sample of 516 Hindu and Muslim participants in rural West Bengal, India. Our treatments are the identity of the two players and the degree of religious fragmentation in the village where subjects reside. Our main finding is that the effect of social identity is small and inconsistent across the two religious groups … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a laboratory experiment, Chowdhury et al (2016) use race as the real identity and a minimal identity as the classification and find support for Sen's proposition at a group level. Chakravarty et al (2016) find a similar result in a lab-in-the-field experiment involving Hindus and Muslims in India. See the survey by Chowdhury (2021) for further studies on identity and conflict.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In a laboratory experiment, Chowdhury et al (2016) use race as the real identity and a minimal identity as the classification and find support for Sen's proposition at a group level. Chakravarty et al (2016) find a similar result in a lab-in-the-field experiment involving Hindus and Muslims in India. See the survey by Chowdhury (2021) for further studies on identity and conflict.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…At the same time, the authors do not find consistent evidence in noncooperative games (Chakravarty et al. ), and Johansson‐Stenman, Mahmud, and Martinsson () similarly find no evidence for intergroup bias among religious groups in Bangladesh. Gupta et al.…”
Section: Related Research Theorizing and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…More generally, we contribute to a growing literature in economics that seeks to better understand the causes and implications of religious violence in India, as well as how to address it (see e.g. Chakravarty et al, 2016Chakravarty et al, , 2019Gupta et al, 2018;Iyer & Shrivastava, 2018;Mitra & Ray, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%