2001
DOI: 10.2307/3185373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Freedom and Indian Rights: The Case of Oregon v. Smith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Claiming wrongful termination, they filed for unemployment compensation with the Oregon Department of Human Resources, a request the Department declined. Smith and Black sued the state of Oregon, resulting in the case Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith , a case that appeared before the United States Supreme Court in 1989 (see Epps, 2012; Long, 2000). While a comprehensive analysis of this case is beyond the scope of this paper, in April 1990, the court concluded that Smith and Black were not entitled to employment compensation since they violated a generally applicable law; that is, a law that applies to all Americans and that therefore inadvertently impacts religion.…”
Section: Entheogens and The War On Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claiming wrongful termination, they filed for unemployment compensation with the Oregon Department of Human Resources, a request the Department declined. Smith and Black sued the state of Oregon, resulting in the case Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith , a case that appeared before the United States Supreme Court in 1989 (see Epps, 2012; Long, 2000). While a comprehensive analysis of this case is beyond the scope of this paper, in April 1990, the court concluded that Smith and Black were not entitled to employment compensation since they violated a generally applicable law; that is, a law that applies to all Americans and that therefore inadvertently impacts religion.…”
Section: Entheogens and The War On Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paired with clinical research, they should inform current policy questions around the implementation of equitable access to PAT. These cultural and legal histories are heterogenous, including psilocybin (30, 31), peyote (32)(33)(34), and ayahuasca (35), evolving in post-colonial communities sometimes in response to social disease and oppression (36) and the prevalent demands for mental health and addiction care (37)(38)(39). As the legality of PAT evolves, we should protect as such "sincere" new groups that adhere to the faith in human interdependency, cemented by the sacrament of intentional group psychedelic use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%