2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00090-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious orientation and schizotypal traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exacerbated by the fact that our sample comprises mainly students exhibiting a reasonably high religious affinity (certainly above that of other UK college students) suggesting that a more diverse sample may be required before we can generalize these findings. Furthermore, as pointed out by Maltby et al (2000) the relationship between spirituality and schizotypy might be also gender-specific. The aspect might be also considered in future studies.…”
Section: Unterrainer Et Al 2012c)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is exacerbated by the fact that our sample comprises mainly students exhibiting a reasonably high religious affinity (certainly above that of other UK college students) suggesting that a more diverse sample may be required before we can generalize these findings. Furthermore, as pointed out by Maltby et al (2000) the relationship between spirituality and schizotypy might be also gender-specific. The aspect might be also considered in future studies.…”
Section: Unterrainer Et Al 2012c)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the ndings, however, from the adult studies is that the association between religiosity and schizotypy seems to be different between men and women (e.g. Maltby et al, 2000). For this reason, we also conducted the above analysis separately for males and females for those aged 13-15 and 17-18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important methodological issue therefore is the measure of religiosity we chose to use, the Francis scale. Maltby et al (2000) used measures of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, nding that whereas intrinsic religiosity was associated with better psychological adjustment, extrinsic religiosity was associated with poorer psychological adjustment. The Francis scale, although more a measure of intrinsic than extrinsic religiosity , was not designed to measure either of these aspects of religiosity, and it is possible that the Francis scale confounds the two aspects of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations