2011
DOI: 10.1080/10656219.2011.590755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Orientation and Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I controlled for the following variables that had been shown to influence sexual uncertainty in previous research as well as in the current data: age (Hensel, Fortenberry, O’Sullivan, & Orr, 2011 ), religiosity (McMillen, Helm, & McBride, 2011 ), sexual experience (Lindgren, Schacht, Mullins, & Blayney, 2011 ), and social comparison orientation (VanYperen & Buunk, 1991 ). Age was measured in years ( M = 14.95, SD = 1.41, in Wave 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…I controlled for the following variables that had been shown to influence sexual uncertainty in previous research as well as in the current data: age (Hensel, Fortenberry, O’Sullivan, & Orr, 2011 ), religiosity (McMillen, Helm, & McBride, 2011 ), sexual experience (Lindgren, Schacht, Mullins, & Blayney, 2011 ), and social comparison orientation (VanYperen & Buunk, 1991 ). Age was measured in years ( M = 14.95, SD = 1.41, in Wave 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Batson et al's (1993) study comprised of undergraduate students verified the reliability of the RLI to be adequate, obtaining the following coefficients for each scale: internal (α = .84), external (α = .79), and quest (α = .78). Another study of undergraduate students by McMillen, Helm, and McBride (2011) generated comparable measures of reliability for the internal (α = .84), external (α = .70), and quest (α = .72) scales, respectively. Although all participants completed the booklet in its entirety, scores on the RLI for participants identified as atheist (indicating between a five and seven on the DTAS) were not used, as the items were not applicable, and thus not valid or discriminating ("strongly disagree" was indicated for all questions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has considered links between personal characteristics and lifetime participation in kissing. Limited evidence suggests that among students attending a Christian-affiliated university, more religious students are less likely to have kissed someone in their lifetime (McMillen, Helm, & McBride, 2011). In contrast to limited research on kissing, extensive research demonstrates that attending religious services more frequently and having more religious attitudes are associated with a decreased likelihood of early vaginal sex (for review, see Rostosky, Wilcox, Comer Wright, & Randall, 2004) and increased likelihood of being abstinent in the late 20’s (Boislard, van de Bongardt, & Blais, 2016; Haydon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Predictors Of Kissingmentioning
confidence: 99%