1993
DOI: 10.1163/157092593x00135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious Pluralism and Religious Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of the theology of religions concerns the variety of ways in which religious traditions reflect on and express their self-understanding of their relationship with other religious traditions. Empirical measures of the theology of religion have been introduced into a series of empirical studies by Ziebertz (1993Ziebertz ( , 1995Ziebertz ( , 1996Ziebertz ( , 2003Ziebertz ( , 2005Ziebertz ( , 2007Ziebertz ( , 2012. Working on and developing the foundations proposed by Ziebertz, Astley and Francis (2016) constructed a new multiple-choice question inviting participants to select one of seven statements that comes closest to their own view on the status of their religious belief.…”
Section: Theological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of the theology of religions concerns the variety of ways in which religious traditions reflect on and express their self-understanding of their relationship with other religious traditions. Empirical measures of the theology of religion have been introduced into a series of empirical studies by Ziebertz (1993Ziebertz ( , 1995Ziebertz ( , 1996Ziebertz ( , 2003Ziebertz ( , 2005Ziebertz ( , 2007Ziebertz ( , 2012. Working on and developing the foundations proposed by Ziebertz, Astley and Francis (2016) constructed a new multiple-choice question inviting participants to select one of seven statements that comes closest to their own view on the status of their religious belief.…”
Section: Theological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works of van der Van and Ziebertz are located on the continuum of this discussion. They have continued and have modernized this discussion by finding that three models are practiced in reality and are empirically identifiable (e.g., Ziebertz 1993Ziebertz , 20032007;Van der Ven 1994;Van der Ven and Ziebertz 1994). Using Buberian language, they introduce the monoreligious model as an "I-perspective" model of education because it addresses Christian perspectives alone.…”
Section: Models Of Theological Education With the Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interreligious model is an "I-You perspective" model of education as it allows mutual encounter and interaction (see Van der Ven 1994;Ziebertz 2007). Ziebertz further describes these approaches as the models of "learning-in" (monoreligious), "learning about" (multireligious), and "learning from" (interreligious) (Ziebertz 1993).…”
Section: Models Of Theological Education With the Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interreligious encounter has implications for religious education, regardless its diverse understandings, thus its ambiguities, and approaches (Jackson, 2016), which in turn determines how religious materials will be delivered. It is assumed here that there are three models of religious education: (1) mono-religious education as a method of learning in a certain religious environment, (2) multireligious education as a method of learning about religions, and (3) interreligious education as a method of learning from religions (Ziebertz, 1993) and that the last model is a legitimate critique and alternative for two other models which has been developed since 1990s (Pollefeyt, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%