2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Religious zones, economic development and modern value orientations: Individual versus contextual effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Religiosity seems to be the least social-level variable employed by researchers investigating environmental concern (Schultz et al 2000;Yuchtman-Yaar and Alkalay 2007). White (1967) argued that Christianity has established a dualism between humans and nature, which made it possible for human beings to dominate nature and exploit it with a sense of indifference towards natural objects.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religiosity seems to be the least social-level variable employed by researchers investigating environmental concern (Schultz et al 2000;Yuchtman-Yaar and Alkalay 2007). White (1967) argued that Christianity has established a dualism between humans and nature, which made it possible for human beings to dominate nature and exploit it with a sense of indifference towards natural objects.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the specific case of attitudes toward homosexuality allows not only to gain a better understanding of acculturation processes among immigrants, but also contributes to the discussion whether cultural values are primarily individual traits or largely dependent on the society an individual lives in (Norris and Inglehart ). Both broader cultural contexts and individual factors — especially religious denomination and religiosity — have been identified as important in shaping public opinions on homosexuality (Yuchtman‐Yaar and Alkalay ; Adamczyk and Pitt ; Sherkat et al. ; Van den Akker, Van der Ploeg, and Scheepers ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political institutions include governments and the constraints they impose on key economic actors. They govern the rules and enforcement of tax rates, tariffs, investment incentives regulations Laportal [33,34], restrictions on foreign ownership [35], government protection [36], labor relations, minimum wage [37], and environmental regulations [38]. Social institutions, meanwhile, are embodied in differences in work ethic (Weber attitudes toward work [33,39] beliefs concerning the basis of productivity [40], and productive capacity, and are the normative and cognitive bases for social exchange [41].…”
Section: Institutional Influences On Organizational Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%