Religiousness and homonegativity in congregations: The role of individual, congregational, and clergy characteristics.

Abstract

Attitudes toward lesbian women and gay men (ATLG) have a direct impact on the health and experience of these individuals. Understanding how these attitudes are formed and enacted, particularly within religious organizations, may point to ways that stigma may be reduced, and health disparities ameliorated. With a sample of 239 congregants from 14 randomly selected places of worship, we examined the influence of individual, congregational, and clergy-level variables on homonegative attitudes. Using survey data from congregants and clergy and observational data from research assistants' observations from attending congregations, we used multilevel models to explore the ability of religiousness and affirmativeness at each level to predict homonegativity. Results indicated that congregation-and clergy-level variables explained 35% of the variation in homonegativity with individual-level variables and error explaining the remaining variation. Of the variables assessed, scriptural literalism (as a congregation-level variable), the lack of affirmativeness of clergy's preaching, and higher frequencies of quoting scripture in services explained the most variation in homonegativity. Overall, relationships between congregation-and clergy-level variables with homonegativity were larger than relationships between individual-level variables and homonegativity. We encourage continued work to examine how congregations and clergy may contribute to the formation and change of ATLG.

Religion/Spirituality, Stress, and Resilience Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: The Religious/Spiritual Stress and Resilience Model

“…For example, many religious dominations have policies that prevent SGM individuals in same-sex relationships or whose gender expression does not match expectations based on their sex assigned at birth from being members and/or holding leadership positions (Lefevor, Sorrell, et al, 2021). Religious community systems may also encourage conformity to cis- and heteronormative conceptions of family (Barnes, 2013; Lefevor, Milburn, et al, 2020; Lefevor, Sorrell, et al, 2021). When SGMs attend religiously based colleges and universities, the welcomeness or unwelcomeness of these views can be magnified (Craig et al, 2017; Etengoff, 2021; Heiden-Rootes, Wiegand, et al, 2020; Steward et al, 2008; L.…”