REM-S–Railway Energy Management in Real Rail Operation

Razik, Lukas; Berr, Nicolas; Khayyam, Sara; Ponci, Ferdinanda; Monti, Antonello

doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2885007

Cited by 33 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar approaches combining hybrid centralized/distributed operation philosophies can be found in [78] and [69]. The first paper proposes a cooperative methodology to improve the overall efficiency of the system.…”

Section: Specific Cases Of Use Of Different Simulation Tools and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 97%

A review of railway feeding infrastructures: Mathematical models for planning and operation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, the authors review the mathematical models, simulation and analysis techniques and energy management systems proposed for railway power supply systems. The authors review both AC and DC railway feeding systems making special emphasis in those that consider new technologies like on-board or wayside energy storage, integration of renewable energies in the traction networks or the use of power electronic devices to increase the efficiency and controllability of the networks. The paper is divided in two main blocks studying DC and AC systems. In both parts, a review of the main simulation tools and models is presented but also a detailed list of specific cases of use of such techniques.

show abstract

Section: Specific Cases Of Use Of Different Simulation Tools and Modelsmentioning

confidence: 97%

A review of railway feeding infrastructures: Mathematical models for planning and operation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Apart from inherent power quality problems that have to be considered by CCTPS operators, the variation in the number, speed, and location of locomotives causes rapid changes in demand within a short time period, requiring different scheduling intervals [10][11][12][13]. Moreover, railway energy management systems contain different time-based operational modes, including day-ahead operation, minute-ahead operation, and realtime operation that can be categorized into two groups from a managed object viewpoint such as train and traction substation energy management systems [14].…”

Section: Background and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multistage Multiobjective Optimization for Optimal Energy Management of the Connected Cophase Traction Power System

Akbari

Fazel

2022

International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a multiobjective energy management model for the connected cophase traction power system (CCTPS). Each traction substation (TSS) includes a power flow controller (PFC), energy storage systems (ESS), wind turbine, and PV modules beside a single-phase traction power transformer. Also, in order to exchange the power between the adjacent TSSs, power transfer controllers (PTCs) are used. The proposed energy management model is formulated as a multistage multiobjective optimization problem with a lexicography approach. In the first stage, the cost of purchased energy is minimized. In the second stage, the independence of the CCTPS from the external grid improved. Finally, minimizing the voltage unbalanced ratio (VUR) of CCTPS is considered as the third stage goal. According to the simulation results, utilizing GAMS optimization software, the proposed model will decrease remarkably VUR and dependency of CCTPS without any increase in operation cost.

show abstract

“…For instance, in [17] the authors present a study held for the 6.6 km Thessaloniki metro line in which they expose the power quality benefits as well as the advantages of installing reversible substations or wayside accumulation systems considering a headway between trains of 300 s. In both cases, the system is modelled as an optimisation problem considering the implementation feasibility of a real-time centralised controller. In this regard, the development of computer tools for carrying out the system analysis and achieve the optimum technological mix and its coordination is mandatory [18]. Nowadays, there are many research lines chasing this objective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Off‐board and on‐board energy storage versus reversible substations in DC railway traction systems

Arboleya

Belaid

El‐Sayed

2020

IET Electrical Systems in Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study describes and analyses a set of quasi-static railway power systems models and simulations considering on-board and off-board energy storage systems but also reversible and non-reversible substations and regenerative braking trains. The advantages and drawbacks of each technology are discussed. Then, several case studies considering different technological combinations are introduced and simulated, while the attained results are compared and analysed. In this regard, to cover all the casuistic, two simple explanatory cases are first exposed and then eight realistic scenarios are examined, which are simulated for a long time interval and also explained considering aggregated results.

show abstract

REM-S–Railway Energy Management in Real Rail Operation

Cited by 33 publications

References 19 publications

A review of railway feeding infrastructures: Mathematical models for planning and operation

A review of railway feeding infrastructures: Mathematical models for planning and operation

Multistage Multiobjective Optimization for Optimal Energy Management of the Connected Cophase Traction Power System

Off‐board and on‐board energy storage versus reversible substations in DC railway traction systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About