2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2019.2920186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ReMAE: User-Friendly Toolbox for Removing Muscle Artifacts From EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was shown to be suitable in detecting artifacts from recordings collected with an easy-to-use electrode and device suitable for demanding clinical environment such as ICU where electrode attachment with minimum preparation is highly appreciated [25]. [26,27]. According to the figure, independent component analysis (ICA) is the most commonly used technique among all the approaches and also among most of EEG processing toolboxes which already been developed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was shown to be suitable in detecting artifacts from recordings collected with an easy-to-use electrode and device suitable for demanding clinical environment such as ICU where electrode attachment with minimum preparation is highly appreciated [25]. [26,27]. According to the figure, independent component analysis (ICA) is the most commonly used technique among all the approaches and also among most of EEG processing toolboxes which already been developed.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, independent component analysis (ICA) was used to remove artifacts such as electromyography and electrooculogram. ReMAE was used to further remove EMG artifacts from EEG signals ( Chen et al, 2020 ). EEG and sEMG data in the beta (14–30 Hz) and gamma bands (31–45 Hz) were selected for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICA-based artifact reduction techniques have been widely used in the field of EEG signal processing because of their powerful signal separation accuracy, simplicity (low computational cost), and ease of use (Delorme et al, 2007;Dimigen, 2019;Jiang et al, 2019). The techniques for limiting ocular and muscular artifacts (Chen et al, 2019;Tian et al, 2020) other than the ICA family are useful if they are integrated in a cascadetype processing module, which can automatically identify the type of artifact contained in the EEG observation. A simple filtering (linear combination) approach such as ICA, which multiplies the demixing matrix W as a filter, is faster and userfriendly.…”
Section: Automatic Processing Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of proposed artifact reduction techniques in most previous studies were evaluated and ranked based on a metric (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio and correlation) that indicates how the signal quality of the estimated neuronal sources was preserved (Islam et al, 2016). We do not know the original (true) neuronal sources of EEG observations; thus, synthetic data whose pseudoneuronal/pseudo-artifactual sources and mixing process are known were usually used to calculate the metric (Chen et al, 2019;Mucarquer et al, 2019). After the quantified evaluation of signal quality in the estimated sources through the proposed artifact reduction technique, the separation ability for real data is qualitatively shown (Blum et al, 2019;Kanoga et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Artifact Reduction For Bcismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation