2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3071622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaining Useful Life Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using CNN-LSTM-DNN Hybrid Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, compared with the prediction results obtained by the prediction model established by its data (Section 5.2), the RMSE difference between these two models is tiny, generally within 0.1%, and the maximum is 0.3%. Thus, it shows that the SOH estimation method constructed by the CEEMDAN-GARG fusion prediction model [52] 0.013 0.008 CNN-LSTM [53] 0.0204 0.01536 CNN-LSTM-DNN [53] 0.0145 0.01897 CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0116 0.009 71 PA-LSTM [45] 0.0163 -RNN [45] 0.0331 -UPE [54] 0.0143 -CEEMD-OMKRVM [54] 0.014 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0102 0.0096 81 LSSVM [55] 0.0267 0.023 MC-RNN [26] 0.0255 0.0223 MC-GRU [26] 0.0282 0.025 BP [51] 0.0586 -NAR [51] 0.0493 -LSTM [51] 0.0352 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.009 0.0077 91 TCN [52] 0.014 0.006 PA-LSTM [45] 0.0166 -AST-LSTM [56] 0.0186 -RNN [45] 0.0484 -BP [51] 0.0394 -NAR [51] 0.0373 -LSTM [51] 0.0302 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0081 0.007 101 RVM [45] 0.0141 -RNN [45] 0.0165 -PA-LSTM [45] 0.006 -MC-RNN [26] 0.0276 0.0219 MC-GRU [26] 0.0286 0.0258 BP [51] 0.0233 -NAR [51] 0.0282 -LSTM [51] 0.0118 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0043 0.0036 values than other prediction models. And with the increase of training data, the prediction is more accurate.…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Of the Fusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, compared with the prediction results obtained by the prediction model established by its data (Section 5.2), the RMSE difference between these two models is tiny, generally within 0.1%, and the maximum is 0.3%. Thus, it shows that the SOH estimation method constructed by the CEEMDAN-GARG fusion prediction model [52] 0.013 0.008 CNN-LSTM [53] 0.0204 0.01536 CNN-LSTM-DNN [53] 0.0145 0.01897 CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0116 0.009 71 PA-LSTM [45] 0.0163 -RNN [45] 0.0331 -UPE [54] 0.0143 -CEEMD-OMKRVM [54] 0.014 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0102 0.0096 81 LSSVM [55] 0.0267 0.023 MC-RNN [26] 0.0255 0.0223 MC-GRU [26] 0.0282 0.025 BP [51] 0.0586 -NAR [51] 0.0493 -LSTM [51] 0.0352 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.009 0.0077 91 TCN [52] 0.014 0.006 PA-LSTM [45] 0.0166 -AST-LSTM [56] 0.0186 -RNN [45] 0.0484 -BP [51] 0.0394 -NAR [51] 0.0373 -LSTM [51] 0.0302 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0081 0.007 101 RVM [45] 0.0141 -RNN [45] 0.0165 -PA-LSTM [45] 0.006 -MC-RNN [26] 0.0276 0.0219 MC-GRU [26] 0.0286 0.0258 BP [51] 0.0233 -NAR [51] 0.0282 -LSTM [51] 0.0118 -CEEMDAN-GARG 0.0043 0.0036 values than other prediction models. And with the increase of training data, the prediction is more accurate.…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Of the Fusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, Zraibi et al proved that adding DNN layer after CNN-LSTM can further improve the performance of prediction. [99] Kara et al used PSO adaptively to adjust the hyperparameters of CNN-LSTM model to improve the prediction performance of the model. [100] Hong et al successively used dilated convolution to extract multi-scale features, 1D-convolution to generate compact features and fully connected layer output prediction, and constructed the first RUL prediction model from the original data to the prediction results, that is, "end-to-end" model.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network (Cnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in order to develop CNN and LSTM in depth for deeper information mining in limited data, Ren et al proposed a new LIB RUL prediction method based on improved CNN and LSTM, namely Auto-CNN-LSTM [ 25 ]. At the same time, Zraibi et al used the hybrid network of CNN, LSTM and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to accurately predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries, which proved that the hybrid network was superior to the single network [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%