2022
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2020.1688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remaking Capitalism: The Strength of Weak Legislation in Mobilizing B Corporation Certification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some maturing firms respond by uniquely altering their human resource investments toward entrepreneurial employees. Future work may extend these insights by studying mechanisms that exhibit variation in agency‐intensity over space and/or time—for example, as in similar legislative changes with varying strength or scope across jurisdictions (Lucas, Grimes, & Gehman, 2022). This would yield insights into how ventures are enabled under different manifestations of a given mechanism 6…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some maturing firms respond by uniquely altering their human resource investments toward entrepreneurial employees. Future work may extend these insights by studying mechanisms that exhibit variation in agency‐intensity over space and/or time—for example, as in similar legislative changes with varying strength or scope across jurisdictions (Lucas, Grimes, & Gehman, 2022). This would yield insights into how ventures are enabled under different manifestations of a given mechanism 6…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the foregoing, we argue that existing certification-based concepts that try to measure firm performance by considering economic, social, and environmental factors (e.g., B-corporations; environmental, social, and governance [ESG]; fair trade) neither make a significant societal change nor MS participation plausible despite their appeal about "remaking capitalism" (Lucas, Grimes, & Gehman, 2020) for better societal outcomes. This is because while certifications may increase the awareness of firms to do the right thing or make government authorities impose more pressure on firms to do more for societal welfare, the inherent corporate model, which relies on competitive advantage and efficiency-based measurement, fails to overcome the ethical dilemma of how to ensure MS participation in a pragmatic and ethical way.…”
Section: Limitations Of Stakeholder Theory In Relation To Ms Conceptu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential question for extrinsically motivated corporations is to determine when it pays to take environmental action (Coen et al, 2022; Lucas et al, 2022) or when green policies can provide a competitive advantage or enhance the reputation of the company (Cubilla‐Montilla et al, 2020). Other firms, however, adopt environmentally responsible policies out of conviction (Thelken & de Jong, 2020; Yasir et al, 2021).…”
Section: Corporate Environmental Behavior: Key Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a social phenomenon, that is, as a community, (Babutsidze & Chai, 2018) industry can stimulate environmental practices and self‐regulation. Lucas et al (2022) point to the authority and legitimation of a group of companies which unite to regulate their collective actions, address common threats or further the common good by establishing a standard code of conduct or the promotion of independent standards. Authors such as Blass et al (2014) or Babutsidze and Chai (2018) go further, emphasizing the greater effectiveness of inter‐industry environment contagion.…”
Section: The Role Of Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%