2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remanent magnetization of oolitic ironstone beds, Hazara area, Lesser Himalayan thrust zone, Northern Pakistan: Its acquisition, timing, and paleoenvironmental implications

Abstract: Chamosite-hematite type oolitic ironstone is distributed in the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary zone of the Hazara area, Lesser Himalayan thrust zone, in the northwestern margin of the Indo-Pakistani subcontinent. A total of 52 oriented samples were collected from 6 beds in two open pit mines, Nathia Gali and Bagnotar. Ferromagnetic properties of the oolitic ironstone are dominated by fine-grained hematite that possesses a characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM). The ChRM is a chemical remanent magneti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sturesson et al (2000) propose that iron ooids form in a shallow turbid sea directly next to volcanism. In contrast, Yoshida et al (1998) suggest rather a non-marine or brackish environment to promote iron-ooid formation. Oxyhydroxides of iron and aluminium, silicon oxide and calcium carbonate are the main components of fossil and modern iron-ooids (Sturesson et al 2000).…”
Section: Oxfordian Sandstonementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sturesson et al (2000) propose that iron ooids form in a shallow turbid sea directly next to volcanism. In contrast, Yoshida et al (1998) suggest rather a non-marine or brackish environment to promote iron-ooid formation. Oxyhydroxides of iron and aluminium, silicon oxide and calcium carbonate are the main components of fossil and modern iron-ooids (Sturesson et al 2000).…”
Section: Oxfordian Sandstonementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Zone I starts with a basal fluvial detritus in the form of siliceous sandstone followed by a pebbly conglomerate (Figures 2, 3), through local high-energy ephemeral channel systems derived from the adjacent highlands (not highlyelevated mountains), as a result of erosional processes, in response to active tectonics. These sediments are enriched in Fe-silicates and Fe-oxyhydroxides and some ferruginous nodules, probably showed earlier diagenetic processes under anoxic conditions (reducing conditions) developed by bacterial activities in the organic materials, and the high sulfate content possibly under brackish conditions, and occasionally under nonmarine conditions (Figure 2 and Figure 9A) (Harder, 1989;Yoshida et al, 1998;Shouyun et al, 2002). In addition, the multiple thin coal layers in zones I, II, and IIIA, with some ash and sulfur, sandwiched between greenish-gray sandstone and siltstone in zone I (Figure 2), originated from a peat swamp in a thick forest moor in a humid and marshy environment.…”
Section: Prevailing Tectonic Control On the Depositional Basinmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Paleocene Lockhart Formation is lying above the ironstone beds and Cretaceous Kawagarh Formation (Table 1) is lying below the Ironstone beds [8,10,11] . The Hangu Formation is overlain by the Lockhart Limestone [8,10,11] . Iron beds also exist at places in the cores of both limbs of anticlines of Paleocene Lockhart Limestone.…”
Section: Geological and Tectonic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%