2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ReMap 2022: a database of Human, Mouse, Drosophila and Arabidopsis regulatory regions from an integrative analysis of DNA-binding sequencing experiments

Abstract: ReMap (https://remap.univ-amu.fr) aims to provide manually curated, high-quality catalogs of regulatory regions resulting from a large-scale integrative analysis of DNA-binding experiments in Human, Mouse, Fly and Arabidopsis thaliana for hundreds of transcription factors and regulators. In this 2022 update, we have uniformly processed >11 000 DNA-binding sequencing datasets from public sources across four species. The updated Human regulatory atlas includes 8103 datasets covering a total of 1210 transc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
209
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
209
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 9th release of JASPAR, we discarded unused collections introduced in early releases of the database ( 27–29 ) that either did not correspond to TF-specific binding profiles or were data-type specific; we maintained the CORE and Unvalidated collections. We computed and compiled TF binding profiles obtained from CAP-SELEX ( 14 ), NCAP-SELEX ( 30 ), SELEX-seq ( 31 ), PBMs ( 32 ), ChIP-seq ( 33–36 ) and DAP-seq experiments from ReMap 2022 ( 36 ) and GEO ( 37 ), and ChIP-exo ( 38 ) data ( Supplementary Data 1 - Text for detailed list of datasets and method details). After manual curation of these profiles to confirm orthogonal supports in the literature, we augmented the CORE collection with 341 new binding profiles for TFs in four taxa (Table 1 ; Figure 1 ): 148 profiles in plants (a 24% expansion for this taxon), 101 profiles in vertebrates (a 13% expansion), 85 profiles in urochordates (only one motif was present since the second release of JASPAR in 2006 ( 27 )), and seven profiles in insects (a 5% expansion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 9th release of JASPAR, we discarded unused collections introduced in early releases of the database ( 27–29 ) that either did not correspond to TF-specific binding profiles or were data-type specific; we maintained the CORE and Unvalidated collections. We computed and compiled TF binding profiles obtained from CAP-SELEX ( 14 ), NCAP-SELEX ( 30 ), SELEX-seq ( 31 ), PBMs ( 32 ), ChIP-seq ( 33–36 ) and DAP-seq experiments from ReMap 2022 ( 36 ) and GEO ( 37 ), and ChIP-exo ( 38 ) data ( Supplementary Data 1 - Text for detailed list of datasets and method details). After manual curation of these profiles to confirm orthogonal supports in the literature, we augmented the CORE collection with 341 new binding profiles for TFs in four taxa (Table 1 ; Figure 1 ): 148 profiles in plants (a 24% expansion for this taxon), 101 profiles in vertebrates (a 13% expansion), 85 profiles in urochordates (only one motif was present since the second release of JASPAR in 2006 ( 27 )), and seven profiles in insects (a 5% expansion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exhaustively revised the metadata to update information about the TF names, the structural class and family of the TF DBDs (following TFClass ( 39 )), and links to external databases such as UniProt ( 40 ), ReMap ( 36 ), UniBind ( 15 , 16 ) and DNA Readout Viewer ( 41 ), whenever possible. Finally, we removed 32 profiles from the CORE collection (22 plant, 6 vertebrate and 4 fungi profiles) as they corresponded to synonyms of already present TF profiles, had low information content, or were derived from consensus strings (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 18 of the 19 SNP–eGene pairs, we found enrichment among the associated co-eGenes for at least one GO term ( Supplementary Table 14 ). Moreover, we assessed potential common TFs regulating the shared function of these co-eGenes using ChIP-seq data processed by ReMap 2022 (33) and found enrichment of TF binding sites among the co-eGenes for 7 of the 19 SNP–eGene pairs ( Supplementary Table 15 ). For four of the SNP–eGene pairs, the co-eQTL SNP itself or a SNP in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) (R 2 ≥ 0.9) lay in the binding region of the enriched TFs ( Supplementary Table 15 ), making these likely candidates for the direct regulator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we explored if these co-eGene sets were enriched for certain TF binding sites. TF annotations were taken from ChIP-seq peaks processed in the ReMap 2022 database (33), which we filtered for cell lines associated with blood cell lines. We tested the overlap of these peaks with the promoter regions of the co-eGenes tested, defining the promoter region as the region 2kB upstream and downstream of the first transcription start site of the gene.…”
Section: Gwas Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%