2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2012)035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remark on the baryonic branch of the warped deformed conifold

Abstract: It has recently been suggested that a superpotential for the baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler field theory (KS) should exist for a sector of the dual supergravity fields. In this note we would like to argue that if extended to cover the whole set of supergravity fields a would-be superpotential does not have a perturbative expansion around the known KS superpotential. Since the family of supergravity duals to the baryonic branch is an expansion around the warped deformed conifold, our argument most li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be interesting to apply the above insights to the Hamiltonian system defined by the so-called baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler background [33]. For this system there seems an unsettled issue about the existence of first-order gradient flow equations [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting to apply the above insights to the Hamiltonian system defined by the so-called baryonic branch of the Klebanov-Strassler background [33]. For this system there seems an unsettled issue about the existence of first-order gradient flow equations [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This N = 4 theory thus provides the proper framework for a unified, systematic study of the supersymmetry properties of those solutions. Besides giving a genuine supergravity origin to the known superpotentials, working in this setup we will provide a superpotential for the solution of [7], clarifying an issue recently put forward in the literature [12,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For multiple fields, on the other hand, it was stated for a while that fake susy serves as a genuine restriction in the sense that not all solutions are fake susy. Even after the single scalar result was extended in a natural way to multiple scalars [16], the literature on the topic remained confusing, with papers reporting on flows without a fake susy description [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%