2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarkable nonlinear optical response of Mn@C20 (M = Na & K and n = 1–6); a DFT outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top and side view of the optimized structure of H 6 -N 3 -belt[6]arene with the important bond distances mentioned are given in Figure 1 . The average bond distance of the edge C—C bond length is 1.41 Å, whereas the C—C bond length of the C—C bonds present at the center of fused rings is extended slightly to 1.45 Å, which is consistent with the reported bond distances [ 72 ]. Moreover, 1.35 Å of bond length is observed for all C—N bonds (see Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The top and side view of the optimized structure of H 6 -N 3 -belt[6]arene with the important bond distances mentioned are given in Figure 1 . The average bond distance of the edge C—C bond length is 1.41 Å, whereas the C—C bond length of the C—C bonds present at the center of fused rings is extended slightly to 1.45 Å, which is consistent with the reported bond distances [ 72 ]. Moreover, 1.35 Å of bond length is observed for all C—N bonds (see Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…B3LYP is well known for the investigation of structural and electronic properties of organic compounds. [18] Optimization is confirmed by vibrational analysis at the same level of theory (no imaginary frequency is observed). Frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) and molecular electrostatic potential is analysed at similar level of theory.…”
Section: Computational Methodologysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Frontier molecular orbital analysis and geometries of sensors 1 and 2 and sensor–I – complexes were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G (d) level of theory. 63 The HOMO–LUMO surfaces of sensors 1 and 2 are depicted in Figures 5 and S17 . It is distinctly explained that in the HOMO level, electronic density was dispersed over the whole sensor molecule, and in the LUMO energy level, the electron density was only limited to the fluorenone core of a sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFT calculations were performed using Gaussian 09 software to support these assumptions. Frontier molecular orbital analysis and geometries of sensors 1 and 2 and sensor–I – complexes were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G (d) level of theory . The HOMO–LUMO surfaces of sensors 1 and 2 are depicted in Figures and S17.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%