2018
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remarkable variation of ribosomal DNA organization and copy number in gnetophytes, a distinct lineage of gymnosperms

Abstract: Gnetophytes are distinct from other gymnosperms and angiosperms as they display surprisingly large variability in rDNA organization and rDNA copy and locus numbers between genera, with no relationship between copy numbers and genome sizes apparent. Concerted evolution of 5S rDNA units seems to have led to the amplification of 5S pseudogenes in both G. montanum and E. altissima. Evolutionary patterns of rDNA show both gymnosperm and angiosperm features underlining the diversity of the group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other eukaryotic organisms (e.g., plants and animals), rDNA CNV has been shown to have a strong positive correlation with genome size, independent of size contributions from rDNA cassettes (Prokopowich et al, 2003;Wencai et al, 2018). Conversely, investigation into this correlation for bacteria has shown no such relationship (Fogel, Collins, Li, & Brunk, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other eukaryotic organisms (e.g., plants and animals), rDNA CNV has been shown to have a strong positive correlation with genome size, independent of size contributions from rDNA cassettes (Prokopowich et al, 2003;Wencai et al, 2018). Conversely, investigation into this correlation for bacteria has shown no such relationship (Fogel, Collins, Li, & Brunk, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this prolongs computation times (typically 5-6 hours on the MetaCentrum ELIXIR computer clusters) we were able to reconstruct 5S rDNA units in the large (50 GB) Fritillaria imperialis genome (Zonneveld, 2010) although, in this case, the number of reads in the cluster was too low, preventing graph analysis. High coverages may also help to reveal rare 5S rDNA variants and pseudogenes that are frequent in gymnosperms (Wang et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2019) while they rarely occur in angiosperms. In interspecific comparisons, the usage of a standard fraction of genome (0.1-1.0%) is recommended to prevent biases in interspecific comparisons.…”
Section: In Silico Identification Of 5s Rdna Repeatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive value of the wide-spread or deep evolutionary invention of silencing supernumerary copies is not known, but may have something to do with facile transcriptional regulation or with stability of the large repeat gene array (Kobayashi 2008;Peng and Karpen 2008;Ianni et al 2017;Paredes et al 2018). That many gene copies are silenced can hide considerable sequence variation (Kim et al 2018;Parks et al 2018), since not all copies of the rDNA need be perfect if potentially toxic mutant rDNA are preferentially inactivated (Eickbush et al 2008;Guerrero and Maggert 2011;Larson et al 2012;Wang et al 2018). Polymorphisms in the intergenic "non-transcribed" spacer, in the regions corresponding to mature rRNAs, in the presence or absence of interrupting retrotransposable elements (Eickbush et al 1997;Eickbush and Eickbush 2003), can all be hidden by silencing, or may contribute to the choice of which copies are silenced (Guerrero and Maggert 2011).…”
Section: The Ribosomal Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%